1915.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:16:41 GMT 2002 1915.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.982 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=49.926 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.923 msec 1915.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1915.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1915.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.982/27.339/49.926/12.116 ms 1915.ms:16.982 27.339 49.926 12.116 1915.loss:0 1930.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:31:41 GMT 2002 1930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.080 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.930 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.929 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.937 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.925 msec 1930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1930.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.930/32.360/39.937/7.418 ms 1930.ms:19.930 32.360 39.937 7.418 1930.loss:0 1945.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:46:41 GMT 2002 1945.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.328 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.951 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1945.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1945.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1945.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.948/22.627/29.951/3.888 ms 1945.ms:19.948 22.627 29.951 3.888 1945.loss:0 2000.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:01:42 GMT 2002 2000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.223 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.956 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.954 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.954 msec 2000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.949/28.407/32.223/4.320 ms 2000.ms:19.949 28.407 32.223 4.320 2000.loss:0 2015.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:16:42 GMT 2002 2015.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=36.336 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.955 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.954 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.961 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=49.952 msec 2015.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.955/39.231/49.952/6.490 ms 2015.ms:29.955 39.231 49.952 6.490 2015.loss:0 2030.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:31:41 GMT 2002 2030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.103 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.945 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.614 msec 2030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.614/30.307/32.103/0.926 ms 2030.ms:29.614 30.307 32.103 0.926 2030.loss:0 2045.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:46:41 GMT 2002 2045.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.583 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 2045.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.941/22.670/29.941/3.902 ms 2045.loss:0 2045.ms:19.941 22.670 29.941 3.902 2100.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:01:41 GMT 2002 2100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.811 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 2100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.944/20.319/21.811/0.761 ms 2100.ms:19.944 20.319 21.811 0.761 2100.loss:0 2115.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:16:41 GMT 2002 2115.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.438 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.925 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.931 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 2115.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.931/24.433/29.939/4.582 ms 2115.ms:19.931 24.433 29.939 4.582 2115.loss:0 2130.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:31:41 GMT 2002 2130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.560 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 2130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/22.065/29.946/3.950 ms 2130.ms:19.933 22.065 29.946 3.950 2130.loss:0 2145.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:46:41 GMT 2002 2145.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.707 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.953 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.925 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.960 msec 2145.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.707/25.896/29.960/4.963 ms 2145.ms:19.707 25.896 29.960 4.963 2145.loss:0 2200.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:01:41 GMT 2002 2200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.145 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 2200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.942/20.387/22.145/0.888 ms 2200.ms:19.942 20.387 22.145 0.888 2200.loss:0 2215.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:16:41 GMT 2002 2215.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.292 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.893 msec 2215.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.292/18.608/19.960/2.662 ms 2215.ms:13.292 18.608 19.960 2.662 2215.loss:0 2230.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:31:41 GMT 2002 2230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.632 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.632/19.286/19.951/1.330 ms 2230.ms:16.632 19.286 19.951 1.330 2230.loss:0 2245.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:46:41 GMT 2002 2245.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.311 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 2245.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.957/20.030/20.311/0.166 ms 2245.ms:19.957 20.030 20.311 0.166 2245.loss:0 2300.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:01:48 GMT 2002 2300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.180 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.059 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.901 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 2300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.059/20.203/22.180/1.043 ms 2300.ms:19.059 20.203 22.180 1.043 2300.loss:0 2315.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:17:00 GMT 2002 2315.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.409 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.924 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.925 msec 2315.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.924/22.426/29.937/3.879 ms 2315.ms:19.924 22.426 29.937 3.879 2315.loss:0 2330.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:31:42 GMT 2002 2330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.649 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.932 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.870 msec 2330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/31.065/39.932/7.882 ms 2330.ms:19.935 31.065 39.932 7.882 2330.loss:0 2345.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:46:56 GMT 2002 2345.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.742 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.934 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.781 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 2345.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.742/23.865/39.781/7.958 ms 2345.ms:19.742 23.865 39.781 7.958 2345.loss:0 0000.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:01:41 GMT 2002 0000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=27.273 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.952 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.951 msec 0000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 27.273/29.413/29.952/1.075 ms 0000.ms:27.273 29.413 29.952 1.075 0000.loss:0 0015.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:16:41 GMT 2002 0015.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=42.727 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=39.952 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.968 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.947 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.957 msec 0015.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.968/32.510/42.727/8.126 ms 0015.ms:19.968 32.510 42.727 8.126 0015.loss:0 0030.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:31:42 GMT 2002 0030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=56.553 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=79.576 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=59.810 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.652 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.862 msec 0030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 39.652/55.090/79.576/14.795 ms 0030.ms:39.652 55.090 79.576 14.795 0030.loss:0 0045.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:46:41 GMT 2002 0045.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=12.704 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.967 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.965 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.973 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 0045.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 12.704/18.513/19.973/2.907 ms 0045.ms:12.704 18.513 19.973 2.907 0045.loss:0 0100.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:01:41 GMT 2002 0100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.703 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.770 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.769 msec 0100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.703/21.028/29.944/4.736 ms 0100.ms:15.703 21.028 29.944 4.736 0100.loss:0 0115.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:16:41 GMT 2002 0115.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.718 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.964 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.965 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0115.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.941/22.508/29.964/3.879 ms 0115.ms:19.941 22.508 29.964 3.879 0115.loss:0 0130.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:31:41 GMT 2002 0130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=29.223 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.938 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=129.945 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=89.940 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.938 msec 0130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.223/63.796/129.945/39.926 ms 0130.ms:29.223 63.796 129.945 39.926 0130.loss:0 0145.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:46:41 GMT 2002 0145.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.227 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.942 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 0145.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.939/24.202/29.946/4.712 ms 0145.ms:19.939 24.202 29.946 4.712 0145.loss:0 0200.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:01:42 GMT 2002 0200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.415 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=18.526 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.526/20.757/25.415/2.393 ms 0200.ms:18.526 20.757 25.415 2.393 0200.loss:0 0215.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:16:41 GMT 2002 0215.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=31.770 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.940 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.943 msec 0215.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.941/34.307/39.943/4.652 ms 0215.ms:29.941 34.307 39.943 4.652 0215.loss:0 0230.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:31:41 GMT 2002 0230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=27.810 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.930 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.938 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 27.810/31.513/39.938/4.293 ms 0230.ms:27.810 31.513 39.938 4.293 0230.loss:0 0245.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:46:42 GMT 2002 0245.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=167.495 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 0245.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.938/49.451/167.495/59.022 ms 0245.ms:19.938 49.451 167.495 59.022 0245.loss:0 0300.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:01:42 GMT 2002 0300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=49.251 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.943 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.951 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.946 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.943/37.807/49.251/7.263 ms 0300.ms:29.943 37.807 49.251 7.263 0300.loss:0 0315.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:16:41 GMT 2002 0315.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=39.421 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.958 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.949 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.958 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.955 msec 0315.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.958/37.848/39.958/3.952 ms 0315.ms:29.958 37.848 39.958 3.952 0315.loss:0 0330.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:31:44 GMT 2002 0330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.803 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.929 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.917 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.919 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.902 msec 0330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.919/27.094/29.929/3.925 ms 0330.ms:19.919 27.094 29.929 3.925 0330.loss:0 0345.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:46:42 GMT 2002 0345.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=37.260 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=39.944 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.945 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.931 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=59.944 msec 0345.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.931/37.404/59.944/13.234 ms 0345.ms:19.931 37.404 59.944 13.234 0345.loss:0 0400.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:01:42 GMT 2002 0400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.376 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.947 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 0400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0400.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/26.227/29.947/4.577 ms 0400.ms:19.933 26.227 29.947 4.577 0400.loss:0 0415.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:16:43 GMT 2002 0415.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.767 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.918 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.918 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.865 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.707 msec 0415.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0415.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0415.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.767/23.635/29.918/5.123 ms 0415.ms:18.767 23.635 29.918 5.123 0415.loss:0 0430.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:31:42 GMT 2002 0430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=28.692 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.932 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.934 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 0430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0430.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/25.685/29.934/4.721 ms 0430.ms:19.935 25.685 29.934 4.721 0430.loss:0 0445.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:46:41 GMT 2002 0445.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.498 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.805 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.931 msec 0445.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0445.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0445.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.498/22.622/29.931/6.367 ms 0445.ms:13.498 22.622 29.931 6.367 0445.loss:0 0500.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:01:42 GMT 2002 0500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=34.304 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.942 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.934 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.930 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.452 msec 0500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0500.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.452/30.712/34.304/1.812 ms 0500.ms:29.452 30.712 34.304 1.812 0500.loss:0 0515.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:16:42 GMT 2002 0515.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=148.241 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=159.941 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=169.947 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=129.943 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=119.947 msec 0515.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0515.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0515.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 119.947/145.603/169.947/18.492 ms 0515.ms:119.947 145.603 169.947 18.492 0515.loss:0 0530.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:31:41 GMT 2002 0530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=33.999 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.956 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.952 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.938 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.954 msec 0530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0530.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.938/30.759/33.999/1.634 ms 0530.ms:29.938 30.759 33.999 1.634 0530.loss:0 0545.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:46:41 GMT 2002 0545.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.250 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 0545.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0545.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0545.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.250/19.209/19.957/1.482 ms 0545.ms:16.250 19.209 19.957 1.482 0545.loss:0 0600.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:01:41 GMT 2002 0600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.538 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=33.358 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 0600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0600.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.945/23.149/33.358/5.202 ms 0600.ms:19.945 23.149 33.358 5.202 0600.loss:0 0615.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:16:41 GMT 2002 0615.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.488 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.893 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 0615.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0615.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0615.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.488/19.644/19.952/0.605 ms 0615.ms:18.488 19.644 19.952 0.605 0615.loss:0 0630.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:31:41 GMT 2002 0630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.450 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.937 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0630.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.937/20.043/20.450/0.255 ms 0630.ms:19.937 20.043 20.450 0.255 0630.loss:0 0645.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:46:42 GMT 2002 0645.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.923 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.937 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0645.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0645.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0645.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.923/19.139/19.948/1.612 ms 0645.ms:15.923 19.139 19.948 1.612 0645.loss:0 0700.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:01:41 GMT 2002 0700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.656 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.929 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.893 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 0700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0700.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.893/20.477/22.656/1.097 ms 0700.ms:19.893 20.477 22.656 1.097 0700.loss:0 0715.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:16:41 GMT 2002 0715.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=24.122 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.938 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0715.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0715.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0715.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.939/22.778/29.938/3.932 ms 0715.loss:0 0715.ms:19.939 22.778 29.938 3.932 0730.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:31:43 GMT 2002 0730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.573 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.916 msec 0730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0730.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.573/19.867/19.953/0.213 ms 0730.ms:19.573 19.867 19.953 0.213 0730.loss:0 0745.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:46:41 GMT 2002 0745.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.892 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.961 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0745.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0745.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0745.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.892/19.144/19.961/1.626 ms 0745.ms:15.892 19.144 19.961 1.626 0745.loss:0 0800.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:01:41 GMT 2002 0800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.077 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.961 msec 0800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0800.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.948/25.974/29.961/4.870 ms 0800.ms:19.948 25.974 29.961 4.870 0800.loss:0 0815.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:16:41 GMT 2002 0815.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.447 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.950 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0815.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0815.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0815.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.953/22.652/29.950/3.895 ms 0815.ms:19.953 22.652 29.950 3.895 0815.loss:0 0830.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:31:41 GMT 2002 0830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.823 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.969 msec 0830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0830.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.823/19.132/19.969/1.656 ms 0830.ms:15.823 19.132 19.969 1.656 0830.loss:0 0845.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:46:41 GMT 2002 0845.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=29.965 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0845.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0845.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0845.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.939/21.945/29.965/4.012 ms 0845.ms:19.939 21.945 29.965 4.012 0845.loss:0 0900.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:01:41 GMT 2002 0900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.879 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.952 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0900.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/28.530/32.879/4.446 ms 0900.ms:19.933 28.530 32.879 4.446 0900.loss:0 0915.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:16:41 GMT 2002 0915.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.427 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0915.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0915.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0915.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/20.640/23.427/1.404 ms 0915.ms:19.935 20.640 23.427 1.404 0915.loss:0 0930.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:31:40 GMT 2002 0930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.463 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=109.949 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0930.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.463/36.650/109.949/36.735 ms 0930.ms:13.463 36.650 109.949 36.735 0930.loss:0 0945.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:46:41 GMT 2002 0945.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.206 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=49.946 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.959 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 0945.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0945.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0945.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.206/27.604/49.946/11.918 ms 0945.ms:18.206 27.604 49.946 11.918 0945.loss:0 1000.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:01:41 GMT 2002 1000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.874 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.963 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.906 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 1000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.874/19.327/19.963/1.236 ms 1000.ms:16.874 19.327 19.963 1.236 1000.loss:0 1015.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:16:40 GMT 2002 1015.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.330 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 1015.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/20.626/23.330/1.352 ms 1015.ms:19.933 20.626 23.330 1.352 1015.loss:0 1030.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:31:41 GMT 2002 1030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.833 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.956 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.952/20.532/22.833/1.157 ms 1030.ms:19.952 20.532 22.833 1.157 1030.loss:0 1045.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:46:41 GMT 2002 1045.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.369 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.753 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 1045.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.951/22.398/29.753/3.796 ms 1045.ms:19.951 22.398 29.753 3.796 1045.loss:0 1100.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:01:41 GMT 2002 1100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.623 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.891 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.891/20.270/21.623/0.688 ms 1100.ms:19.891 20.270 21.623 0.688 1100.loss:0 1115.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:16:41 GMT 2002 1115.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=12.115 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.936 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 1115.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 12.115/20.376/29.936/5.660 ms 1115.ms:12.115 20.376 29.936 5.660 1115.loss:0 1130.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:31:41 GMT 2002 1130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.954 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.924 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.924/20.540/22.954/1.216 ms 1130.ms:19.924 20.540 22.954 1.216 1130.loss:0 1145.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:46:40 GMT 2002 1145.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.774 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=169.940 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 1145.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.774/49.707/169.940/60.118 ms 1145.ms:18.774 49.707 169.940 60.118 1145.loss:0 1200.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:01:41 GMT 2002 1200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.418 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.903 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.961 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.418/19.036/19.961/1.817 ms 1200.ms:15.418 19.036 19.961 1.817 1200.loss:0 1215.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:16:40 GMT 2002 1215.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.399 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.963 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 1215.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.399/18.844/19.963/2.224 ms 1215.ms:14.399 18.844 19.963 2.224 1215.loss:0 1230.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:31:41 GMT 2002 1230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.057 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.951 msec 1230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.946/23.973/39.951/7.989 ms 1230.ms:19.946 23.973 39.951 7.989 1230.loss:0 1245.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:46:41 GMT 2002 1245.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.028 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.910 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.917 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.895 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.915 msec 1245.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.895/20.933/25.028/2.047 ms 1245.ms:19.895 20.933 25.028 2.047 1245.loss:0 1300.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:01:40 GMT 2002 1300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=17.873 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 17.873/19.539/19.960/0.833 ms 1300.ms:17.873 19.539 19.960 0.833 1300.loss:0 1315.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:16:41 GMT 2002 1315.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.454 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.925 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.905 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.845 msec 1315.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.454/19.210/19.925/1.384 ms 1315.ms:16.454 19.210 19.925 1.384 1315.loss:0 1330.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:31:41 GMT 2002 1330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.695 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.929 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.929/20.691/23.695/1.509 ms 1330.ms:19.929 20.691 23.695 1.509 1330.loss:0 1345.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:46:41 GMT 2002 1345.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.204 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 1345.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.204/19.793/19.944/0.307 ms 1345.ms:19.204 19.793 19.944 0.307 1345.loss:0 1400.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:01:41 GMT 2002 1400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.509 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.937 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1400.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.509/19.257/19.951/1.379 ms 1400.ms:16.509 19.257 19.951 1.379 1400.loss:0 1415.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:16:41 GMT 2002 1415.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=11.637 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.957 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1415.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1415.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1415.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 11.637/20.286/29.957/5.809 ms 1415.ms:11.637 20.286 29.957 5.809 1415.loss:0 1430.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:31:42 GMT 2002 1430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=39.538 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 1430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1430.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.942/25.863/39.538/7.858 ms 1430.ms:19.942 25.863 39.538 7.858 1430.loss:0 1445.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:46:41 GMT 2002 1445.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.161 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1445.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1445.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1445.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.161/19.791/19.954/0.339 ms 1445.ms:19.161 19.791 19.954 0.339 1445.loss:0 1500.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:01:41 GMT 2002 1500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.352 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.966 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 1500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1500.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.352/18.836/19.966/2.245 ms 1500.ms:14.352 18.836 19.966 2.245 1500.loss:0 1515.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:16:41 GMT 2002 1515.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.603 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.957 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.955 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 1515.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1515.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1515.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.952/24.284/29.957/4.673 ms 1515.ms:19.952 24.284 29.957 4.673 1515.loss:0 1530.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:31:42 GMT 2002 1530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.011 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.420 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=17.957 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.913 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.778 msec 1530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1530.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 17.957/19.415/20.011/0.776 ms 1530.ms:17.957 19.415 20.011 0.776 1530.loss:0 1545.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:46:41 GMT 2002 1545.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.106 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.920 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.918 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.922 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1545.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1545.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1545.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.106/19.557/19.923/0.747 ms 1545.ms:18.106 19.557 19.923 0.747 1545.loss:0 1600.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:01:42 GMT 2002 1600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=28.570 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.950 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.945 msec 1600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1600.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.944/29.670/39.945/6.351 ms 1600.ms:19.944 29.670 39.945 6.351 1600.loss:0 1615.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:16:41 GMT 2002 1615.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.831 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.891 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 1615.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1615.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1615.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.831/19.900/19.936/0.182 ms 1615.ms:19.831 19.900 19.936 0.182 1615.loss:0 1630.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:31:41 GMT 2002 1630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.623 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.956 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1630.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.952/22.484/29.937/3.870 ms 1630.ms:19.952 22.484 29.937 3.870 1630.loss:0 1645.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:46:41 GMT 2002 1645.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.664 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.956 msec 1645.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1645.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1645.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.947/20.296/21.664/0.689 ms 1645.ms:19.947 20.296 21.664 0.689 1645.loss:0 1700.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:01:42 GMT 2002 1700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=30.113 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=39.934 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.965 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=199.961 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 1700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1700.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.957/61.986/199.961/69.385 ms 1700.ms:19.957 61.986 199.961 69.385 1700.loss:0 1715.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:16:41 GMT 2002 1715.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.259 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.948 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1715.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1715.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1715.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.953/22.014/29.948/3.970 ms 1715.ms:19.953 22.014 29.948 3.970 1715.loss:0 1724.ping:+ date 1724.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:26:33 GMT 2002 1724.ping:+ qping buda.lag.net 1724.ping:+ ping -c 5 buda.lag.net 1724.ping:+ p=11904 1724.ping:+ wait 1724.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1724.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=48.132 msec 1724.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.910 msec 1724.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1724.ping:2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss 1724.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.910/39.021/48.132/9.111 ms 1724.ms:29.910 39.021 48.132 9.111 1724.loss:0 1730.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:31:41 GMT 2002 1730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.979 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.961 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.959 msec 1730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1730.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.979/21.160/29.959/4.664 ms 1730.ms:15.979 21.160 29.959 4.664 1730.loss:0 1736.ping:+ date 1736.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:37:24 GMT 2002 1736.ping:+ qping buda.lag.net 1736.ping:+ ping -c 5 buda.lag.net 1736.ping:+ p=12695 1736.ping:+ wait 1736.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1736.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1736.ping:1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss 1736.ms:399 399 399 1736.loss:100 1738.ping:+ date 1738.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:38:32 GMT 2002 1738.ping:+ qping buda.lag.net 1738.ping:+ ping -c 5 buda.lag.net 1738.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.704 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.914 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 1738.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1738.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1738.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.704/22.887/29.941/6.066 ms 1738.ms:14.704 22.887 29.941 6.066 1738.loss:0 1745.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:45:32 GMT 2002 1745.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.987 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.901 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.924 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1745.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1745.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1745.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.945/25.141/29.924/4.476 ms 1745.ms:19.945 25.141 29.924 4.476 1745.loss:0 1800.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:00:34 GMT 2002 1800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=34.809 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.928 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.925 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 1800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1800.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.917/28.903/34.809/4.875 ms 1800.ms:19.917 28.903 34.809 4.875 1800.loss:0 1815.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:15:32 GMT 2002 1815.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=45.142 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.929 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.930 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1815.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1815.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1815.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.929/24.976/45.142/10.084 ms 1815.ms:19.929 24.976 45.142 10.084 1815.loss:0 1830.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:30:33 GMT 2002 1830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=26.380 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.936 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=149.945 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 1830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1830.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 26.380/53.229/149.945/48.377 ms 1830.ms:26.380 53.229 149.945 48.377 1830.loss:0 1845.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:45:34 GMT 2002 1845.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.334 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.917 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.927 msec 1845.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1845.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1845.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.334/18.808/19.932/2.240 ms 1845.ms:14.334 18.808 19.932 2.240 1845.loss:0 1900.ping:Fri Feb 22 19:00:34 GMT 2002 1900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=17.312 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.906 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.925 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1900.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 17.312/19.403/19.938/1.049 ms 1900.ms:17.312 19.403 19.938 1.049 1900.loss:0 08250130.ping:Wed Aug 25 01:30:16 PDT 2010 08250130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 08250130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 08250130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 08250130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 08250130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 08250130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08250130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.457/38.868/39.808/0.928 ms 08250130.ms:37.457 38.868 39.808 0.928 08250130.loss:0 08250200.ping:Wed Aug 25 02:00:16 PDT 2010 08250200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.4 ms 08250200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=49.6 ms 08250200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 08250200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08250200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08250200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08250200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.434/40.074/49.607/6.753 ms 08250200.ms:28.434 40.074 49.607 6.753 08250200.loss:0 08250230.ping:Wed Aug 25 02:30:16 PDT 2010 08250230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 08250230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08250230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 08250230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08250230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08250230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.981/35.365/36.535/0.625 ms 08250230.ms:34.981 35.365 36.535 0.625 08250230.loss:0 08250300.ping:Wed Aug 25 03:00:16 PDT 2010 08250300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=71.5 ms 08250300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=29.2 ms 08250300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 08250300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=28.6 ms 08250300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 08250300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.690/41.604/71.572/15.672 ms 08250300.ms:28.690 41.604 71.572 15.672 08250300.loss:0 08250330.ping:Wed Aug 25 03:30:16 PDT 2010 08250330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 08250330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 08250330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 08250330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 08250330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 08250330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.907/37.967/39.690/1.156 ms 08250330.ms:36.907 37.967 39.690 1.156 08250330.loss:0 08250400.ping:Wed Aug 25 04:00:16 PDT 2010 08250400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=98.9 ms 08250400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=77.3 ms 08250400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=56.9 ms 08250400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=157 ms 08250400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 08250400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.930/85.579/157.644/41.537 ms 08250400.ms:36.930 85.579 157.644 41.537 08250400.loss:0 08250430.ping:Wed Aug 25 04:30:16 PDT 2010 08250430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=517 ms 08250430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=439 ms 08250430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=400 ms 08250430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=468 ms 08250430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=468 ms 08250430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 5098ms 08250430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 400.253/458.903/517.163/38.519 ms 08250430.ms:400.253 458.903 517.163 38.519 08250430.loss:0 08250500.ping:Wed Aug 25 05:00:16 PDT 2010 08250500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08250500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 08250500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 08250500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 08250500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.2 ms 08250500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.214/39.654/47.251/3.832 ms 08250500.ms:37.214 39.654 47.251 3.832 08250500.loss:0 08250530.ping:Wed Aug 25 05:30:16 PDT 2010 08250530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 08250530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=28.5 ms 08250530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 08250530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 08250530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 08250530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.555/36.426/39.602/3.985 ms 08250530.ms:28.555 36.426 39.602 3.985 08250530.loss:0 08250600.ping:Wed Aug 25 06:00:16 PDT 2010 08250600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=100 ms 08250600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 08250600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 08250600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=28.6 ms 08250600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 08250600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.617/49.124/100.245/25.870 ms 08250600.ms:28.617 49.124 100.245 25.870 08250600.loss:0 08250630.ping:Wed Aug 25 06:30:16 PDT 2010 08250630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=46.5 ms 08250630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 08250630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=59.2 ms 08250630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 08250630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 08250630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08250630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.597/44.262/59.233/8.131 ms 08250630.ms:37.597 44.262 59.233 8.131 08250630.loss:0 08250700.ping:Wed Aug 25 07:00:16 PDT 2010 08250700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 08250700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.1 ms 08250700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.3 ms 08250700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 08250700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 08250700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.139/41.604/47.318/4.662 ms 08250700.ms:37.139 41.604 47.318 4.662 08250700.loss:0 08250730.ping:Wed Aug 25 07:30:16 PDT 2010 08250730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 08250730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 08250730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=77.6 ms 08250730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 08250730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 08250730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08250730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.364/45.859/77.650/15.911 ms 08250730.ms:37.364 45.859 77.650 15.911 08250730.loss:0 08250800.ping:Wed Aug 25 08:00:16 PDT 2010 08250800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 08250800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 08250800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 08250800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 08250800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08250800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.170/39.899/41.930/3.382 ms 08250800.ms:33.170 39.899 41.930 3.382 08250800.loss:0 08250830.ping:Wed Aug 25 08:30:17 PDT 2010 08250830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 08250830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 08250830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 08250830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 08250830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08250830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.004/35.601/36.549/0.571 ms 08250830.ms:35.004 35.601 36.549 0.571 08250830.loss:0 08250900.ping:Wed Aug 25 09:00:16 PDT 2010 08250900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 08250900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 08250900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=30.9 ms 08250900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08250900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 08250900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08250900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.903/38.485/41.436/3.908 ms 08250900.ms:30.903 38.485 41.436 3.908 08250900.loss:0 08250930.ping:Wed Aug 25 09:30:16 PDT 2010 08250930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08250930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 08250930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08250930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 08250930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 08250930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=109 ms 08250930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08250930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08250930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.102/53.734/109.283/27.783 ms 08250930.ms:39.102 53.734 109.283 27.783 08250930.loss:0 08251000.ping:Wed Aug 25 10:00:17 PDT 2010 08251000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08251000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 08251000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.9 ms 08251000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 08251000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 08251000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.546/37.534/52.945/7.767 ms 08251000.ms:32.546 37.534 52.945 7.767 08251000.loss:0 08251030.ping:Wed Aug 25 10:30:17 PDT 2010 08251030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=72.5 ms 08251030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 08251030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 08251030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 08251030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=61.0 ms 08251030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.723/51.253/72.505/13.170 ms 08251030.ms:40.723 51.253 72.505 13.170 08251030.loss:0 08251100.ping:Wed Aug 25 11:00:16 PDT 2010 08251100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 08251100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 08251100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=27.2 ms 08251100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 08251100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 08251100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.246/35.466/38.837/4.169 ms 08251100.ms:27.246 35.466 38.837 4.169 08251100.loss:0 08251130.ping:Wed Aug 25 11:30:16 PDT 2010 08251130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=23.3 ms 08251130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.5 ms 08251130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 08251130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=23.8 ms 08251130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=29.3 ms 08251130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 08251130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.332/30.768/43.510/7.430 ms 08251130.ms:23.332 30.768 43.510 7.430 08251130.loss:0 08251200.ping:Wed Aug 25 12:00:16 PDT 2010 08251200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 08251200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 08251200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 08251200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 08251200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.6 ms 08251200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.949/40.739/42.664/3.407 ms 08251200.ms:33.949 40.739 42.664 3.407 08251200.loss:0 08251230.ping:Wed Aug 25 12:30:16 PDT 2010 08251230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=213 ms 08251230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=251 ms 08251230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=312 ms 08251230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=321 ms 08251230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=461 ms 08251230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 213.614/312.385/461.797/84.664 ms 08251230.ms:213.614 312.385 461.797 84.664 08251230.loss:0 08251300.ping:Wed Aug 25 13:00:17 PDT 2010 08251300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=256 ms 08251300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=267 ms 08251300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=268 ms 08251300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=321 ms 08251300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=288 ms 08251300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08251300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 256.387/280.453/321.451/22.959 ms 08251300.ms:256.387 280.453 321.451 22.959 08251300.loss:0 08251330.ping:Wed Aug 25 13:30:16 PDT 2010 08251330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.6 ms 08251330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=90.0 ms 08251330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=180 ms 08251330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=211 ms 08251330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=271 ms 08251330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08251330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.677/156.393/271.303/86.619 ms 08251330.ms:28.677 156.393 271.303 86.619 08251330.loss:0 08251400.ping:Wed Aug 25 14:00:17 PDT 2010 08251400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=243 ms 08251400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=232 ms 08251400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=212 ms 08251400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=272 ms 08251400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=251 ms 08251400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 212.180/242.451/272.005/19.942 ms 08251400.ms:212.180 242.451 272.005 19.942 08251400.loss:0 08251430.ping:Wed Aug 25 14:30:16 PDT 2010 08251430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 08251430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=25.0 ms 08251430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.7 ms 08251430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 08251430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 08251430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08251430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.073/31.415/35.922/4.919 ms 08251430.ms:25.073 31.415 35.922 4.919 08251430.loss:0 08251500.ping:Wed Aug 25 15:00:16 PDT 2010 08251500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 08251500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 08251500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 08251500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 08251500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 08251500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.268/41.316/43.052/1.064 ms 08251500.ms:40.268 41.316 43.052 1.064 08251500.loss:0 08251530.ping:Wed Aug 25 15:30:16 PDT 2010 08251530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 08251530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 08251530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=26.8 ms 08251530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 08251530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08251530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.845/35.633/39.510/4.519 ms 08251530.ms:26.845 35.633 39.510 4.519 08251530.loss:0 08251600.ping:Wed Aug 25 16:00:17 PDT 2010 08251600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 08251600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 08251600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.5 ms 08251600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.9 ms 08251600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 08251600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08251600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.468/42.274/48.917/4.933 ms 08251600.ms:37.468 42.274 48.917 4.933 08251600.loss:0 08251630.ping:Wed Aug 25 16:30:16 PDT 2010 08251630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=44.8 ms 08251630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 08251630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=74.3 ms 08251630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.0 ms 08251630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=23.9 ms 08251630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.923/44.357/74.318/16.797 ms 08251630.ms:23.923 44.357 74.318 16.797 08251630.loss:0 08251700.ping:Wed Aug 25 17:00:17 PDT 2010 08251700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=238 ms 08251700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=259 ms 08251700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=240 ms 08251700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=221 ms 08251700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=221 ms 08251700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08251700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 221.127/236.406/259.937/14.414 ms 08251700.ms:221.127 236.406 259.937 14.414 08251700.loss:0 08251730.ping:Wed Aug 25 17:30:16 PDT 2010 08251730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=503 ms 08251730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=679 ms 08251730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=509 ms 08251730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=509 ms 08251730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=539 ms 08251730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 5733ms 08251730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 503.111/548.250/679.541/66.872 ms 08251730.ms:503.111 548.250 679.541 66.872 08251730.loss:0 08251800.ping:Wed Aug 25 18:00:17 PDT 2010 08251800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 08251800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 08251800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 08251800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08251800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=74.1 ms 08251800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.804/42.350/74.199/15.936 ms 08251800.ms:33.804 42.350 74.199 15.936 08251800.loss:0 08251830.ping:Wed Aug 25 18:30:16 PDT 2010 08251830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=234 ms 08251830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=212 ms 08251830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=212 ms 08251830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=282 ms 08251830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=312 ms 08251830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 212.498/250.938/312.533/40.037 ms 08251830.ms:212.498 250.938 312.533 40.037 08251830.loss:0 08251900.ping:Wed Aug 25 19:00:16 PDT 2010 08251900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 08251900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=73.8 ms 08251900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 08251900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 08251900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 08251900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.190/45.768/73.866/14.850 ms 08251900.ms:33.190 45.768 73.866 14.850 08251900.loss:0 08251930.ping:Wed Aug 25 19:30:16 PDT 2010 08251930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08251930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 08251930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08251930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 08251930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=30.0 ms 08251930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 08251930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08251930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08251930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.055/38.990/42.803/4.602 ms 08251930.ms:30.055 38.990 42.803 4.602 08251930.loss:0 08252000.ping:Wed Aug 25 20:00:16 PDT 2010 08252000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08252000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=262 ms 08252000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=253 ms 08252000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=264 ms 08252000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=245 ms 08252000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=285 ms 08252000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08252000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08252000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 245.116/262.268/285.042/13.379 ms 08252000.ms:245.116 262.268 285.042 13.379 08252000.loss:0 08252030.ping:Wed Aug 25 20:30:16 PDT 2010 08252030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08252030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=259 ms 08252030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=269 ms 08252030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=260 ms 08252030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=251 ms 08252030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=290 ms 08252030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08252030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 6609ms 08252030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 251.047/266.053/290.164/13.374 ms 08252030.ms:251.047 266.053 290.164 13.374 08252030.loss:0 08252100.ping:Wed Aug 25 21:00:17 PDT 2010 08252100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08252100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 08252100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 08252100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 08252100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 08252100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 08252100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08252100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08252100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.736/38.314/39.462/0.622 ms 08252100.ms:37.736 38.314 39.462 0.622 08252100.loss:0 08252130.ping:Wed Aug 25 21:30:11 PDT 2010 08252130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08252130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 08252130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 08252130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 08252130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 08252130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08252130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08252130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08252130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.593/40.239/42.141/3.330 ms 08252130.ms:33.593 40.239 42.141 3.330 08252130.loss:0 08252200.ping:Wed Aug 25 22:00:16 PDT 2010 08252200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08252200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 08252200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08252200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 08252200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=31.4 ms 08252200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 08252200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08252200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3996ms 08252200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.400/36.968/41.099/4.144 ms 08252200.ms:31.400 36.968 41.099 4.144 08252200.loss:0 08252230.ping:Wed Aug 25 22:30:16 PDT 2010 08252230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08252230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=449 ms 08252230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=488 ms 08252230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=398 ms 08252230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=418 ms 08252230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=218 ms 08252230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08252230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08252230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 218.001/394.416/488.063/93.287 ms 08252230.ms:218.001 394.416 488.063 93.287 08252230.loss:0 08252300.ping:Wed Aug 25 23:00:16 PDT 2010 08252300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08252300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 08252300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08252300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=31.4 ms 08252300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.4 ms 08252300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 08252300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08252300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08252300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.421/39.615/51.488/7.272 ms 08252300.ms:31.421 39.615 51.488 7.272 08252300.loss:0 08252330.ping:Wed Aug 25 23:30:17 PDT 2010 08252330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08252330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 08252330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 08252330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.4 ms 08252330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 08252330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 08252330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08252330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08252330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.288/41.648/49.466/3.941 ms 08252330.ms:39.288 41.648 49.466 3.941 08252330.loss:0 08260000.ping:Thu Aug 26 00:00:16 PDT 2010 08260000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=27.5 ms 08260000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 08260000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 08260000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=29.9 ms 08260000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 08260000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08260000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.595/34.881/39.328/5.064 ms 08260000.ms:27.595 34.881 39.328 5.064 08260000.loss:0 08260030.ping:Thu Aug 26 00:30:17 PDT 2010 08260030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=91.6 ms 08260030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08260030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=89.6 ms 08260030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=80.0 ms 08260030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.4 ms 08260030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08260030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.741/70.114/91.639/21.430 ms 08260030.ms:39.741 70.114 91.639 21.430 08260030.loss:0 08260100.ping:Thu Aug 26 01:00:17 PDT 2010 08260100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 08260100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=56.3 ms 08260100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 08260100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08260100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08260100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08260100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.066/40.236/56.386/8.075 ms 08260100.ms:36.066 40.236 56.386 8.075 08260100.loss:0 08260130.ping:Thu Aug 26 01:30:17 PDT 2010 08260130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=184 ms 08260130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=135 ms 08260130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=122 ms 08260130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 08260130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 08260130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08260130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.889/103.823/184.689/57.651 ms 08260130.ms:32.889 103.823 184.689 57.651 08260130.loss:0 08260200.ping:Thu Aug 26 02:00:16 PDT 2010 08260200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 08260200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.2 ms 08260200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08260200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 08260200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.8 ms 08260200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08260200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.513/40.998/45.895/4.351 ms 08260200.ms:35.513 40.998 45.895 4.351 08260200.loss:0 08260230.ping:Thu Aug 26 02:30:17 PDT 2010 08260230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 08260230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 08260230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 08260230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 08260230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08260230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08260230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.938/35.771/37.611/1.428 ms 08260230.ms:33.938 35.771 37.611 1.428 08260230.loss:0 08260300.ping:Thu Aug 26 03:00:16 PDT 2010 08260300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 08260300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 08260300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08260300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 08260300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08260300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08260300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.622/41.177/42.837/0.844 ms 08260300.ms:40.622 41.177 42.837 0.844 08260300.loss:0 08260330.ping:Thu Aug 26 03:30:16 PDT 2010 08260330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=214 ms 08260330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=222 ms 08260330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=192 ms 08260330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=242 ms 08260330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=211 ms 08260330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08260330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 192.117/216.519/242.116/16.172 ms 08260330.ms:192.117 216.519 242.116 16.172 08260330.loss:0 08260400.ping:Thu Aug 26 04:00:16 PDT 2010 08260400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=208 ms 08260400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=239 ms 08260400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=270 ms 08260400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=300 ms 08260400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=220 ms 08260400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08260400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 208.612/248.028/300.620/33.597 ms 08260400.ms:208.612 248.028 300.620 33.597 08260400.loss:0 08260430.ping:Thu Aug 26 04:30:16 PDT 2010 08260430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 08260430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=23.6 ms 08260430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 08260430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 08260430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 08260430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08260430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.690/37.242/43.398/7.851 ms 08260430.ms:23.690 37.242 43.398 7.851 08260430.loss:0 08260500.ping:Thu Aug 26 05:00:16 PDT 2010 08260500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 08260500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 08260500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08260500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08260500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08260500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08260500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.598/35.331/36.158/1.009 ms 08260500.ms:33.598 35.331 36.158 1.009 08260500.loss:0 08260530.ping:Thu Aug 26 05:30:16 PDT 2010 08260530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 08260530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 08260530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 08260530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.2 ms 08260530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 08260530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08260530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.248/39.749/42.531/3.837 ms 08260530.ms:32.248 39.749 42.531 3.837 08260530.loss:0 08260600.ping:Thu Aug 26 06:00:16 PDT 2010 08260600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=263 ms 08260600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=274 ms 08260600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=235 ms 08260600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=275 ms 08260600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=305 ms 08260600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08260600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 235.446/270.890/305.571/22.587 ms 08260600.ms:235.446 270.890 305.571 22.587 08260600.loss:0 08260630.ping:Thu Aug 26 06:30:16 PDT 2010 08260630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=46.9 ms 08260630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 08260630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 08260630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 08260630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 08260630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08260630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.734/38.155/46.987/4.422 ms 08260630.ms:35.734 38.155 46.987 4.422 08260630.loss:0 08260700.ping:Thu Aug 26 07:00:16 PDT 2010 08260700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08260700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 08260700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=116 ms 08260700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.4 ms 08260700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 08260700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08260700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.298/54.910/116.400/30.961 ms 08260700.ms:36.298 54.910 116.400 30.961 08260700.loss:0 08260730.ping:Thu Aug 26 07:30:17 PDT 2010 08260730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=79.1 ms 08260730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 08260730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08260730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=67.4 ms 08260730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=97.4 ms 08260730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08260730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.805/63.636/97.475/23.737 ms 08260730.ms:36.805 63.636 97.475 23.737 08260730.loss:0 08260800.ping:Thu Aug 26 08:00:16 PDT 2010 08260800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=244 ms 08260800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=215 ms 08260800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=272 ms 08260800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=252 ms 08260800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=221 ms 08260800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08260800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 215.344/241.129/272.050/20.597 ms 08260800.ms:215.344 241.129 272.050 20.597 08260800.loss:0 08260830.ping:Thu Aug 26 08:30:17 PDT 2010 08260830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=300 ms 08260830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=251 ms 08260830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=292 ms 08260830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=312 ms 08260830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=272 ms 08260830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08260830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 251.779/286.034/312.450/21.484 ms 08260830.ms:251.779 286.034 312.450 21.484 08260830.loss:0 08260900.ping:Thu Aug 26 09:00:16 PDT 2010 08260900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 08260900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 08260900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 08260900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 08260900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 08260900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08260900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.155/41.141/43.099/1.138 ms 08260900.ms:40.155 41.141 43.099 1.138 08260900.loss:0 08260930.ping:Thu Aug 26 09:30:17 PDT 2010 08260930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08260930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08260930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 08260930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.9 ms 08260930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 08260930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 08260930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08260930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08260930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.410/44.048/52.924/4.511 ms 08260930.ms:40.410 44.048 52.924 4.511 08260930.loss:0 08261000.ping:Thu Aug 26 10:00:16 PDT 2010 08261000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 08261000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 08261000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.2 ms 08261000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 08261000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 08261000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08261000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.672/39.424/47.271/4.059 ms 08261000.ms:36.672 39.424 47.271 4.059 08261000.loss:0 08261030.ping:Thu Aug 26 10:30:16 PDT 2010 08261030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=222 ms 08261030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=253 ms 08261030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=323 ms 08261030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=435 ms 08261030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=525 ms 08261030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3996ms 08261030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 222.105/352.083/525.946/113.629 ms 08261030.ms:222.105 352.083 525.946 113.629 08261030.loss:0 08261100.ping:Thu Aug 26 11:00:17 PDT 2010 08261100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=64.6 ms 08261100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.4 ms 08261100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08261100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=26.7 ms 08261100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 08261100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08261100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.712/41.889/64.618/12.811 ms 08261100.ms:26.712 41.889 64.618 12.811 08261100.loss:0 08261130.ping:Thu Aug 26 11:30:16 PDT 2010 08261130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 08261130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 08261130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08261130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08261130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 08261130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08261130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.865/38.474/42.069/4.427 ms 08261130.ms:31.865 38.474 42.069 4.427 08261130.loss:0 08261200.ping:Thu Aug 26 12:00:17 PDT 2010 08261200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08261200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 08261200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 08261200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08261200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=29.6 ms 08261200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08261200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.615/38.925/43.072/4.816 ms 08261200.ms:29.615 38.925 43.072 4.816 08261200.loss:0 08261230.ping:Thu Aug 26 12:30:16 PDT 2010 08261230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=93.5 ms 08261230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08261230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=64.6 ms 08261230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.9 ms 08261230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=72.0 ms 08261230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08261230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.335/63.295/93.520/19.797 ms 08261230.ms:34.335 63.295 93.520 19.797 08261230.loss:0 08261300.ping:Thu Aug 26 13:00:17 PDT 2010 08261300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=141 ms 08261300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 08261300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 08261300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 08261300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 08261300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08261300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.823/62.267/141.964/40.033 ms 08261300.ms:39.823 62.267 141.964 40.033 08261300.loss:0 08261330.ping:Thu Aug 26 13:30:16 PDT 2010 08261330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=224 ms 08261330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=402 ms 08261330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=212 ms 08261330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 08261330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 08261330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08261330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 42.196/184.840/402.814/134.563 ms 08261330.ms:42.196 184.840 402.814 134.563 08261330.loss:0 08261400.ping:Thu Aug 26 14:00:16 PDT 2010 08261400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=276 ms 08261400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=277 ms 08261400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=288 ms 08261400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=269 ms 08261400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=338 ms 08261400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08261400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 269.043/290.190/338.711/25.055 ms 08261400.ms:269.043 290.190 338.711 25.055 08261400.loss:0 08261430.ping:Thu Aug 26 14:30:16 PDT 2010 08261430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 08261430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 08261430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 08261430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 08261430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 08261430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08261430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.448/35.605/43.366/3.887 ms 08261430.ms:33.448 35.605 43.366 3.887 08261430.loss:0 08261500.ping:Thu Aug 26 15:00:17 PDT 2010 08261500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 08261500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.0 ms 08261500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08261500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 08261500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 08261500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08261500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.271/39.369/46.061/4.410 ms 08261500.ms:35.271 39.369 46.061 4.410 08261500.loss:0 08261530.ping:Thu Aug 26 15:30:16 PDT 2010 08261530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=263 ms 08261530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=291 ms 08261530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=332 ms 08261530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=353 ms 08261530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=274 ms 08261530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08261530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 263.724/303.321/353.677/34.395 ms 08261530.ms:263.724 303.321 353.677 34.395 08261530.loss:0 08261600.ping:Thu Aug 26 16:00:16 PDT 2010 08261600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=55.7 ms 08261600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 08261600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 08261600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 08261600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.7 ms 08261600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08261600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.810/42.138/55.776/8.091 ms 08261600.ms:33.810 42.138 55.776 8.091 08261600.loss:0 08261630.ping:Thu Aug 26 16:30:17 PDT 2010 08261630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 08261630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 08261630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 08261630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 08261630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.6 ms 08261630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08261630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.508/40.522/42.726/4.013 ms 08261630.ms:32.508 40.522 42.726 4.013 08261630.loss:0 08261700.ping:Thu Aug 26 17:00:16 PDT 2010 08261700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=48.2 ms 08261700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 08261700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 08261700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 08261700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08261700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08261700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.827/39.343/48.283/4.481 ms 08261700.ms:36.827 39.343 48.283 4.481 08261700.loss:0 08261730.ping:Thu Aug 26 17:30:17 PDT 2010 08261730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08261730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.5 ms 08261730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=50.4 ms 08261730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=70.1 ms 08261730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=80.1 ms 08261730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08261730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 42.081/57.282/80.189/15.208 ms 08261730.ms:42.081 57.282 80.189 15.208 08261730.loss:0 08261800.ping:Thu Aug 26 18:00:16 PDT 2010 08261800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=556 ms 08261800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=469 ms 08261800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=508 ms 08261800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=548 ms 08261800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=528 ms 08261800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4037ms 08261800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 469.441/522.470/556.432/31.272 ms 08261800.ms:469.441 522.470 556.432 31.272 08261800.loss:0 08261830.ping:Thu Aug 26 18:30:16 PDT 2010 08261830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 08261830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 08261830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.6 ms 08261830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.6 ms 08261830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 08261830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08261830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.223/42.774/51.681/5.534 ms 08261830.ms:34.223 42.774 51.681 5.534 08261830.loss:0 08261900.ping:Thu Aug 26 19:00:16 PDT 2010 08261900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=74.6 ms 08261900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 08261900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.7 ms 08261900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 08261900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=46.7 ms 08261900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08261900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.478/48.260/74.616/13.964 ms 08261900.ms:35.478 48.260 74.616 13.964 08261900.loss:0 08261930.ping:Thu Aug 26 19:30:14 PDT 2010 08261930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08261930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=319 ms 08261930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=237 ms 08261930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=317 ms 08261930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=417 ms 08261930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=267 ms 08261930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08261930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08261930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 237.791/311.914/417.550/61.195 ms 08261930.ms:237.791 311.914 417.550 61.195 08261930.loss:0 08262000.ping:Thu Aug 26 20:00:16 PDT 2010 08262000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08262000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=585 ms 08262000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=609 ms 08262000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=650 ms 08262000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=611 ms 08262000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=611 ms 08262000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08262000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 6274ms 08262000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 585.559/613.632/650.444/20.834 ms 08262000.ms:585.559 613.632 650.444 20.834 08262000.loss:0 08262030.ping:Thu Aug 26 20:30:16 PDT 2010 08262030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08262030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 08262030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 08262030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 08262030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.8 ms 08262030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08262030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08262030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08262030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.795/37.040/44.809/3.895 ms 08262030.ms:34.795 37.040 44.809 3.895 08262030.loss:0 08262100.ping:Thu Aug 26 21:00:16 PDT 2010 08262100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08262100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=80.5 ms 08262100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08262100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08262100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 08262100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=71.3 ms 08262100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08262100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08262100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.878/55.025/80.559/17.352 ms 08262100.ms:40.878 55.025 80.559 17.352 08262100.loss:0 08262130.ping:Thu Aug 26 21:30:16 PDT 2010 08262130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08262130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=69.4 ms 08262130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 08262130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 08262130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 08262130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 08262130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08262130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08262130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.460/43.380/69.467/13.046 ms 08262130.ms:36.460 43.380 69.467 13.046 08262130.loss:0 08262200.ping:Thu Aug 26 22:00:16 PDT 2010 08262200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08262200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 08262200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=51.6 ms 08262200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=50.9 ms 08262200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08262200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 08262200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08262200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08262200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.326/43.383/51.665/7.200 ms 08262200.ms:32.326 43.383 51.665 7.200 08262200.loss:0 08262230.ping:Thu Aug 26 22:30:16 PDT 2010 08262230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08262230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=169 ms 08262230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=230 ms 08262230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=211 ms 08262230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=232 ms 08262230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=273 ms 08262230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08262230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3996ms 08262230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 169.250/223.182/273.203/33.723 ms 08262230.ms:169.250 223.182 273.203 33.723 08262230.loss:0 08262300.ping:Thu Aug 26 23:00:16 PDT 2010 08262300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08262300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 08262300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08262300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08262300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.8 ms 08262300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 08262300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08262300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08262300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.340/37.000/44.827/3.994 ms 08262300.ms:34.340 37.000 44.827 3.994 08262300.loss:0 08262330.ping:Thu Aug 26 23:30:16 PDT 2010 08262330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08262330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 08262330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 08262330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 08262330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=24.3 ms 08262330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 08262330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08262330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08262330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.371/32.807/36.473/4.304 ms 08262330.ms:24.371 32.807 36.473 4.304 08262330.loss:0 08270000.ping:Fri Aug 27 00:00:17 PDT 2010 08270000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=408 ms 08270000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=169 ms 08270000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=210 ms 08270000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=230 ms 08270000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=230 ms 08270000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08270000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 169.831/250.107/408.609/82.303 ms 08270000.ms:169.831 250.107 408.609 82.303 08270000.loss:0 08270030.ping:Fri Aug 27 00:30:16 PDT 2010 08270030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 08270030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 08270030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08270030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 08270030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 08270030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08270030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.948/37.371/39.359/1.310 ms 08270030.ms:35.948 37.371 39.359 1.310 08270030.loss:0 08270100.ping:Fri Aug 27 01:00:16 PDT 2010 08270100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=65.5 ms 08270100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=24.9 ms 08270100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.0 ms 08270100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=24.3 ms 08270100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 08270100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08270100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.344/38.835/65.509/15.318 ms 08270100.ms:24.344 38.835 65.509 15.318 08270100.loss:0 08270130.ping:Fri Aug 27 01:30:16 PDT 2010 08270130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 08270130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08270130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 08270130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 08270130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=62.3 ms 08270130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08270130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.267/43.316/62.384/10.151 ms 08270130.ms:34.267 43.316 62.384 10.151 08270130.loss:0 08270200.ping:Fri Aug 27 02:00:16 PDT 2010 08270200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 08270200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 08270200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 08270200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 08270200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.0 ms 08270200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08270200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.453/37.854/45.087/4.911 ms 08270200.ms:33.453 37.854 45.087 4.911 08270200.loss:0 08270230.ping:Fri Aug 27 02:30:16 PDT 2010 08270230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=654 ms 08270230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=799 ms 08270230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=708 ms 08270230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=739 ms 08270230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=789 ms 08270230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 5395ms 08270230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 654.349/738.126/799.287/53.394 ms 08270230.ms:654.349 738.126 799.287 53.394 08270230.loss:0 08270300.ping:Fri Aug 27 03:00:16 PDT 2010 08270300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=47.4 ms 08270300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 08270300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 08270300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.9 ms 08270300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.5 ms 08270300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08270300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.467/44.589/48.901/4.584 ms 08270300.ms:38.467 44.589 48.901 4.584 08270300.loss:0 08270330.ping:Fri Aug 27 03:30:16 PDT 2010 08270330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.5 ms 08270330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=29.8 ms 08270330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 08270330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=79.6 ms 08270330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08270330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08270330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.874/44.236/79.650/18.197 ms 08270330.ms:29.874 44.236 79.650 18.197 08270330.loss:0 08270400.ping:Fri Aug 27 04:00:16 PDT 2010 08270400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 08270400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 08270400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 08270400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=84.4 ms 08270400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 08270400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08270400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.454/47.882/84.422/18.783 ms 08270400.ms:33.454 47.882 84.422 18.783 08270400.loss:0 08270430.ping:Fri Aug 27 04:30:16 PDT 2010 08270430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 08270430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 08270430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=88.1 ms 08270430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=28.6 ms 08270430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 08270430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08270430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.620/45.719/88.126/21.493 ms 08270430.ms:28.620 45.719 88.126 21.493 08270430.loss:0 08270500.ping:Fri Aug 27 05:00:16 PDT 2010 08270500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=301 ms 08270500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=232 ms 08270500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=223 ms 08270500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=263 ms 08270500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=223 ms 08270500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08270500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 223.408/248.852/301.441/30.116 ms 08270500.ms:223.408 248.852 301.441 30.116 08270500.loss:0 08270530.ping:Fri Aug 27 05:30:16 PDT 2010 08270530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08270530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=83.9 ms 08270530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.5 ms 08270530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=23.3 ms 08270530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 08270530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08270530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.366/43.931/83.935/21.011 ms 08270530.ms:23.366 43.931 83.935 21.011 08270530.loss:0 08270600.ping:Fri Aug 27 06:00:16 PDT 2010 08270600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 08270600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08270600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 08270600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 08270600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08270600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08270600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.050/38.969/42.072/3.639 ms 08270600.ms:34.050 38.969 42.072 3.639 08270600.loss:0 08270630.ping:Fri Aug 27 06:30:16 PDT 2010 08270630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 08270630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 08270630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 08270630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 08270630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=62.4 ms 08270630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08270630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.844/40.977/62.459/11.279 ms 08270630.ms:32.844 40.977 62.459 11.279 08270630.loss:0 08270700.ping:Fri Aug 27 07:00:16 PDT 2010 08270700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 08270700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 08270700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 08270700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 08270700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 08270700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08270700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.540/36.249/42.140/4.362 ms 08270700.ms:32.540 36.249 42.140 4.362 08270700.loss:0 08270730.ping:Fri Aug 27 07:30:16 PDT 2010 08270730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=226 ms 08270730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=325 ms 08270730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=305 ms 08270730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=315 ms 08270730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=325 ms 08270730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08270730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 226.810/299.762/325.738/37.228 ms 08270730.ms:226.810 299.762 325.738 37.228 08270730.loss:0 08270800.ping:Fri Aug 27 08:00:16 PDT 2010 08270800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 08270800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 08270800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 08270800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=123 ms 08270800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=183 ms 08270800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08270800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.997/83.745/183.614/60.233 ms 08270800.ms:32.997 83.745 183.614 60.233 08270800.loss:0 08270830.ping:Fri Aug 27 08:30:17 PDT 2010 08270830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=79.5 ms 08270830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 08270830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 08270830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=97.7 ms 08270830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 08270830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08270830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.142/57.829/97.793/25.843 ms 08270830.ms:37.142 57.829 97.793 25.843 08270830.loss:0 08270900.ping:Fri Aug 27 09:00:17 PDT 2010 08270900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08270900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 08270900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 08270900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 08270900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 08270900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08270900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.046/37.583/43.436/4.712 ms 08270900.ms:33.046 37.583 43.436 4.712 08270900.loss:0 08270930.ping:Fri Aug 27 09:30:17 PDT 2010 08270930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08270930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=73.2 ms 08270930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=194 ms 08270930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 08270930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 08270930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08270930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08270930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08270930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.928/74.684/194.576/61.733 ms 08270930.ms:34.928 74.684 194.576 61.733 08270930.loss:0 08271000.ping:Fri Aug 27 10:00:17 PDT 2010 08271000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=833 ms 08271000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=469 ms 08271000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=290 ms 08271000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=841 ms 08271000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=601 ms 08271000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4122ms 08271000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 290.280/607.366/841.518/212.429 ms 08271000.ms:290.280 607.366 841.518 212.429 08271000.loss:0 08271030.ping:Fri Aug 27 10:30:16 PDT 2010 08271030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=77.0 ms 08271030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 08271030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 08271030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=77.1 ms 08271030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 08271030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08271030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.147/52.607/77.138/20.033 ms 08271030.ms:35.147 52.607 77.138 20.033 08271030.loss:0 08271100.ping:Fri Aug 27 11:00:14 PDT 2010 08271100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 08271100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=73.8 ms 08271100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 08271100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 08271100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08271100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08271100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.921/42.227/73.888/15.847 ms 08271100.ms:32.921 42.227 73.888 15.847 08271100.loss:0 08271130.ping:Fri Aug 27 11:30:16 PDT 2010 08271130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 08271130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 08271130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 08271130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 08271130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 08271130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08271130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.977/40.580/42.268/0.877 ms 08271130.ms:39.977 40.580 42.268 0.877 08271130.loss:0 08271200.ping:Fri Aug 27 12:00:17 PDT 2010 08271200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.6 ms 08271200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.7 ms 08271200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 08271200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 08271200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 08271200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08271200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.697/37.422/46.731/5.830 ms 08271200.ms:28.697 37.422 46.731 5.830 08271200.loss:0 08271230.ping:Fri Aug 27 12:30:16 PDT 2010 08271230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=1028 ms 08271230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=918 ms 08271230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=549 ms 08271230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=578 ms 08271230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=578 ms 08271230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4849ms 08271230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 549.326/730.598/1028.237/201.518 ms, pipe 2 08271230.ms:549.326 730.598 1028.237 201.518 08271230.loss:0 08271300.ping:Fri Aug 27 13:00:14 PDT 2010 08271300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 08271300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 08271300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08271300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=141 ms 08271300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 08271300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08271300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.810/62.221/141.712/39.752 ms 08271300.ms:41.810 62.221 141.712 39.752 08271300.loss:0 08271330.ping:Fri Aug 27 13:30:17 PDT 2010 08271330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 08271330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 08271330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 08271330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 08271330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 08271330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08271330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.385/35.912/37.139/0.675 ms 08271330.ms:35.385 35.912 37.139 0.675 08271330.loss:0 08271400.ping:Fri Aug 27 14:00:16 PDT 2010 08271400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08271400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08271400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 08271400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=77.3 ms 08271400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 08271400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08271400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.229/44.629/77.322/16.364 ms 08271400.ms:35.229 44.629 77.322 16.364 08271400.loss:0 08271430.ping:Fri Aug 27 14:30:16 PDT 2010 08271430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=143 ms 08271430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 08271430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08271430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08271430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 08271430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08271430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.533/56.753/143.757/43.503 ms 08271430.ms:34.533 56.753 143.757 43.503 08271430.loss:0 08271500.ping:Fri Aug 27 15:00:16 PDT 2010 08271500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 08271500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=76.1 ms 08271500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=87.5 ms 08271500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 08271500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 08271500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08271500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.160/54.614/87.530/22.540 ms 08271500.ms:35.160 54.614 87.530 22.540 08271500.loss:0 08271530.ping:Fri Aug 27 15:30:08 PDT 2010 08271530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 08271530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 08271530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 08271530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.9 ms 08271530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 08271530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4006ms 08271530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.173/41.728/51.906/6.033 ms 08271530.ms:34.173 41.728 51.906 6.033 08271530.loss:0 08271600.ping:Fri Aug 27 16:00:16 PDT 2010 08271600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 08271600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 08271600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 08271600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08271600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08271600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08271600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.606/39.126/40.753/0.827 ms 08271600.ms:38.606 39.126 40.753 0.827 08271600.loss:0 08271630.ping:Fri Aug 27 16:30:17 PDT 2010 08271630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 08271630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 08271630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 08271630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.4 ms 08271630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 08271630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08271630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.489/39.350/46.461/3.695 ms 08271630.ms:36.489 39.350 46.461 3.695 08271630.loss:0 08271700.ping:Fri Aug 27 17:00:16 PDT 2010 08271700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08271700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=55.4 ms 08271700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 08271700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=62.7 ms 08271700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 08271700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08271700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.446/45.487/62.716/11.815 ms 08271700.ms:32.446 45.487 62.716 11.815 08271700.loss:0 08271730.ping:Fri Aug 27 17:30:16 PDT 2010 08271730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=175 ms 08271730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=143 ms 08271730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=163 ms 08271730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=174 ms 08271730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=174 ms 08271730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08271730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 143.457/166.141/175.496/12.154 ms 08271730.ms:143.457 166.141 175.496 12.154 08271730.loss:0 08271800.ping:Fri Aug 27 18:00:16 PDT 2010 08271800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 08271800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08271800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08271800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08271800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 08271800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08271800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.431/40.823/42.238/0.708 ms 08271800.ms:40.431 40.823 42.238 0.708 08271800.loss:0 08271830.ping:Fri Aug 27 18:30:16 PDT 2010 08271830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 08271830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.3 ms 08271830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 08271830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 08271830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 08271830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 08271830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.575/37.351/44.361/3.810 ms 08271830.ms:34.575 37.351 44.361 3.810 08271830.loss:0 08271900.ping:Fri Aug 27 19:00:16 PDT 2010 08271900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=531 ms 08271900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=549 ms 08271900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=540 ms 08271900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=520 ms 08271900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=510 ms 08271900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4570ms 08271900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 510.622/530.539/549.492/13.845 ms 08271900.ms:510.622 530.539 549.492 13.845 08271900.loss:0 08271930.ping:Fri Aug 27 19:30:16 PDT 2010 08271930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08271930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=611 ms 08271930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=639 ms 08271930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=660 ms 08271930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=700 ms 08271930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=680 ms 08271930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08271930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4270ms 08271930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 611.564/658.607/700.968/31.226 ms 08271930.ms:611.564 658.607 700.968 31.226 08271930.loss:0 08272000.ping:Fri Aug 27 20:00:15 PDT 2010 08272000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08272000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=72.3 ms 08272000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=50.6 ms 08272000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08272000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08272000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=30.5 ms 08272000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08272000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08272000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.537/46.893/72.381/14.245 ms 08272000.ms:30.537 46.893 72.381 14.245 08272000.loss:0 08272030.ping:Fri Aug 27 20:30:16 PDT 2010 08272030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08272030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=109 ms 08272030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=127 ms 08272030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=137 ms 08272030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=117 ms 08272030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=56.9 ms 08272030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08272030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08272030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 56.992/109.484/137.004/27.874 ms 08272030.ms:56.992 109.484 137.004 27.874 08272030.loss:0 08272100.ping:Fri Aug 27 21:00:16 PDT 2010 08272100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08272100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 08272100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=58.5 ms 08272100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 08272100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 08272100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 08272100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08272100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08272100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.451/42.957/58.578/7.839 ms 08272100.ms:38.451 42.957 58.578 7.839 08272100.loss:0 08272130.ping:Fri Aug 27 21:30:10 PDT 2010 08272130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08272130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 08272130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 08272130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 08272130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 08272130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 08272130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08272130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08272130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.564/36.634/42.830/4.372 ms 08272130.ms:32.564 36.634 42.830 4.372 08272130.loss:0 08272200.ping:Fri Aug 27 22:00:16 PDT 2010 08272200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08272200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=279 ms 08272200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=217 ms 08272200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=206 ms 08272200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=247 ms 08272200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=237 ms 08272200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08272200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08272200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 206.800/237.491/279.075/25.197 ms 08272200.ms:206.800 237.491 279.075 25.197 08272200.loss:0 08272230.ping:Fri Aug 27 22:30:16 PDT 2010 08272230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08272230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=87.1 ms 08272230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 08272230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 08272230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 08272230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08272230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08272230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08272230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.809/48.357/87.161/19.411 ms 08272230.ms:37.809 48.357 87.161 19.411 08272230.loss:0 08272300.ping:Fri Aug 27 23:00:16 PDT 2010 08272300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08272300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 08272300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 08272300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=44.9 ms 08272300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 08272300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=54.9 ms 08272300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08272300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08272300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.788/41.435/54.973/7.680 ms 08272300.ms:34.788 41.435 54.973 7.680 08272300.loss:0 08272330.ping:Fri Aug 27 23:30:16 PDT 2010 08272330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08272330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 08272330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 08272330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 08272330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 08272330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 08272330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08272330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08272330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.922/36.314/37.161/0.866 ms 08272330.ms:34.922 36.314 37.161 0.866 08272330.loss:0 08280000.ping:Sat Aug 28 00:00:16 PDT 2010 08280000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 08280000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 08280000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.2 ms 08280000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08280000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08280000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.841/40.020/47.250/3.828 ms 08280000.ms:36.841 40.020 47.250 3.828 08280000.loss:0 08280030.ping:Sat Aug 28 00:30:16 PDT 2010 08280030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=475 ms 08280030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=486 ms 08280030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=488 ms 08280030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=487 ms 08280030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=508 ms 08280030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08280030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 475.896/489.522/508.857/10.714 ms 08280030.ms:475.896 489.522 508.857 10.714 08280030.loss:0 08280100.ping:Sat Aug 28 01:00:16 PDT 2010 08280100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08280100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08280100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=26.9 ms 08280100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 08280100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 08280100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08280100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.911/34.380/37.110/3.820 ms 08280100.ms:26.911 34.380 37.110 3.820 08280100.loss:0 08280130.ping:Sat Aug 28 01:30:16 PDT 2010 08280130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08280130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 08280130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08280130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08280130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08280130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08280130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.716/40.772/41.448/0.730 ms 08280130.ms:39.716 40.772 41.448 0.730 08280130.loss:0 08280200.ping:Sat Aug 28 02:00:16 PDT 2010 08280200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=223 ms 08280200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=231 ms 08280200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=181 ms 08280200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=271 ms 08280200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=241 ms 08280200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 181.880/230.277/271.972/29.186 ms 08280200.ms:181.880 230.277 271.972 29.186 08280200.loss:0 08280230.ping:Sat Aug 28 02:30:16 PDT 2010 08280230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=23.0 ms 08280230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 08280230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 08280230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 08280230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 08280230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08280230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.095/31.386/33.699/4.147 ms 08280230.ms:23.095 31.386 33.699 4.147 08280230.loss:0 08280300.ping:Sat Aug 28 03:00:16 PDT 2010 08280300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 08280300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08280300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 08280300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 08280300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 08280300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.856/38.812/41.829/3.582 ms 08280300.ms:33.856 38.812 41.829 3.582 08280300.loss:0 08280330.ping:Sat Aug 28 03:30:16 PDT 2010 08280330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 08280330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 08280330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 08280330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 08280330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 08280330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.833/40.484/42.247/0.909 ms 08280330.ms:39.833 40.484 42.247 0.909 08280330.loss:0 08280400.ping:Sat Aug 28 04:00:16 PDT 2010 08280400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 08280400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08280400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08280400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 08280400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.7 ms 08280400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.832/38.362/45.740/3.783 ms 08280400.ms:35.832 38.362 45.740 3.783 08280400.loss:0 08280430.ping:Sat Aug 28 04:30:16 PDT 2010 08280430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 08280430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08280430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 08280430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 08280430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 08280430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.886/38.941/42.195/3.742 ms 08280430.ms:33.886 38.941 42.195 3.742 08280430.loss:0 08280500.ping:Sat Aug 28 05:00:16 PDT 2010 08280500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 08280500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 08280500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.0 ms 08280500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08280500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=176 ms 08280500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.080/66.850/176.816/55.099 ms 08280500.ms:36.080 66.850 176.816 55.099 08280500.loss:0 08280530.ping:Sat Aug 28 05:30:17 PDT 2010 08280530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.3 ms 08280530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 08280530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08280530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 08280530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 08280530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.360/35.311/39.168/3.649 ms 08280530.ms:28.360 35.311 39.168 3.649 08280530.loss:0 08280600.ping:Sat Aug 28 06:00:16 PDT 2010 08280600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=456 ms 08280600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=447 ms 08280600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=464 ms 08280600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=464 ms 08280600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=437 ms 08280600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08280600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 437.373/454.017/464.913/10.610 ms 08280600.ms:437.373 454.017 464.913 10.610 08280600.loss:0 08280630.ping:Sat Aug 28 06:30:17 PDT 2010 08280630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=226 ms 08280630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=338 ms 08280630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=558 ms 08280630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=518 ms 08280630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=519 ms 08280630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08280630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 226.846/432.409/558.978/128.193 ms 08280630.ms:226.846 432.409 558.978 128.193 08280630.loss:0 08280700.ping:Sat Aug 28 07:00:16 PDT 2010 08280700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 08280700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=27.4 ms 08280700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=44.5 ms 08280700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 08280700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08280700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.418/35.546/44.520/5.485 ms 08280700.ms:27.418 35.546 44.520 5.485 08280700.loss:0 08280730.ping:Sat Aug 28 07:30:16 PDT 2010 08280730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08280730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=71.3 ms 08280730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=31.5 ms 08280730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=30.5 ms 08280730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=90.6 ms 08280730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08280730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.545/53.122/90.656/23.877 ms 08280730.ms:30.545 53.122 90.656 23.877 08280730.loss:0 08280800.ping:Sat Aug 28 08:00:17 PDT 2010 08280800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 08280800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 08280800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=74.6 ms 08280800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08280800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 08280800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.455/43.067/74.694/15.838 ms 08280800.ms:34.455 43.067 74.694 15.838 08280800.loss:0 08280830.ping:Sat Aug 28 08:30:16 PDT 2010 08280830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=222 ms 08280830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=263 ms 08280830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=224 ms 08280830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=244 ms 08280830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=264 ms 08280830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08280830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 222.851/244.271/264.873/18.164 ms 08280830.ms:222.851 244.271 264.873 18.164 08280830.loss:0 08280900.ping:Sat Aug 28 09:00:16 PDT 2010 08280900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 08280900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=61.0 ms 08280900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08280900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 08280900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08280900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08280900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.345/43.110/61.049/9.538 ms 08280900.ms:32.345 43.110 61.049 9.538 08280900.loss:0 08280930.ping:Sat Aug 28 09:30:16 PDT 2010 08280930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08280930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=272 ms 08280930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=314 ms 08280930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=334 ms 08280930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=305 ms 08280930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=274 ms 08280930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08280930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08280930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 272.851/300.357/334.943/23.772 ms 08280930.ms:272.851 300.357 334.943 23.772 08280930.loss:0 08281000.ping:Sat Aug 28 10:00:16 PDT 2010 08281000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 08281000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=59.4 ms 08281000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08281000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.5 ms 08281000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 08281000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08281000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.509/43.547/59.401/8.742 ms 08281000.ms:36.509 43.547 59.401 8.742 08281000.loss:0 08281030.ping:Sat Aug 28 10:30:16 PDT 2010 08281030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 08281030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=89.5 ms 08281030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=30.3 ms 08281030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08281030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=60.5 ms 08281030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08281030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.377/51.885/89.596/21.320 ms 08281030.ms:30.377 51.885 89.596 21.320 08281030.loss:0 08281100.ping:Sat Aug 28 11:00:16 PDT 2010 08281100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 08281100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 08281100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 08281100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 08281100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.1 ms 08281100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08281100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.048/37.453/44.184/4.719 ms 08281100.ms:33.048 37.453 44.184 4.719 08281100.loss:0 08281130.ping:Sat Aug 28 11:30:17 PDT 2010 08281130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=820 ms 08281130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=799 ms 08281130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=920 ms 08281130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=830 ms 08281130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=740 ms 08281130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281130.ping:6 packets transmitted, 5 received, 16% packet loss, time 6589ms 08281130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 740.364/822.481/920.743/58.290 ms 08281130.ms:740.364 822.481 920.743 58.290 08281130.loss:16 08281200.ping:Sat Aug 28 12:00:17 PDT 2010 08281200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=714 ms 08281200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=709 ms 08281200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=728 ms 08281200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=639 ms 08281200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=800 ms 08281200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4564ms 08281200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 639.048/718.311/800.003/51.311 ms 08281200.ms:639.048 718.311 800.003 51.311 08281200.loss:0 08281230.ping:Sat Aug 28 12:30:16 PDT 2010 08281230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=649 ms 08281230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=809 ms 08281230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=898 ms 08281230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=829 ms 08281230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=858 ms 08281230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 5230ms 08281230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 649.484/809.212/898.929/85.358 ms 08281230.ms:649.484 809.212 898.929 85.358 08281230.loss:0 08281300.ping:Sat Aug 28 13:00:16 PDT 2010 08281300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=560 ms 08281300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=559 ms 08281300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=590 ms 08281300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=621 ms 08281300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=521 ms 08281300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4150ms 08281300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 521.024/570.714/621.103/33.532 ms 08281300.ms:521.024 570.714 621.103 33.532 08281300.loss:0 08281330.ping:Sat Aug 28 13:30:16 PDT 2010 08281330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=149 ms 08281330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=217 ms 08281330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=247 ms 08281330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=277 ms 08281330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=357 ms 08281330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08281330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 149.500/249.656/357.103/68.418 ms 08281330.ms:149.500 249.656 357.103 68.418 08281330.loss:0 08281400.ping:Sat Aug 28 14:00:17 PDT 2010 08281400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=139 ms 08281400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=97.5 ms 08281400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=97.9 ms 08281400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=97.2 ms 08281400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=107 ms 08281400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08281400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 97.220/107.864/139.342/16.178 ms 08281400.ms:97.220 107.864 139.342 16.178 08281400.loss:0 08281430.ping:Sat Aug 28 14:30:16 PDT 2010 08281430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=29.2 ms 08281430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 08281430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=30.9 ms 08281430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 08281430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 08281430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08281430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.262/36.620/41.530/5.350 ms 08281430.ms:29.262 36.620 41.530 5.350 08281430.loss:0 08281500.ping:Sat Aug 28 15:00:16 PDT 2010 08281500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 08281500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=25.7 ms 08281500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 08281500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=25.4 ms 08281500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=65.5 ms 08281500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08281500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.430/37.936/65.546/14.643 ms 08281500.ms:25.430 37.936 65.546 14.643 08281500.loss:0 08281530.ping:Sat Aug 28 15:30:17 PDT 2010 08281530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=278 ms 08281530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=239 ms 08281530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=246 ms 08281530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=236 ms 08281530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=246 ms 08281530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08281530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 236.178/249.373/278.300/14.991 ms 08281530.ms:236.178 249.373 278.300 14.991 08281530.loss:0 08281600.ping:Sat Aug 28 16:00:16 PDT 2010 08281600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=230 ms 08281600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=232 ms 08281600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=203 ms 08281600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=214 ms 08281600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=222 ms 08281600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08281600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 203.149/220.666/232.145/10.893 ms 08281600.ms:203.149 220.666 232.145 10.893 08281600.loss:0 08281630.ping:Sat Aug 28 16:30:16 PDT 2010 08281630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08281630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 08281630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 08281630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 08281630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 08281630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08281630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.970/39.653/41.379/0.885 ms 08281630.ms:38.970 39.653 41.379 0.885 08281630.loss:0 08281700.ping:Sat Aug 28 17:00:16 PDT 2010 08281700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 08281700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 08281700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=81.7 ms 08281700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08281700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.5 ms 08281700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08281700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.525/49.996/81.730/16.872 ms 08281700.ms:33.525 49.996 81.730 16.872 08281700.loss:0 08281730.ping:Sat Aug 28 17:30:16 PDT 2010 08281730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 08281730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08281730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08281730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 08281730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 08281730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08281730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.102/39.245/43.197/3.862 ms 08281730.ms:34.102 39.245 43.197 3.862 08281730.loss:0 08281800.ping:Sat Aug 28 18:00:13 PDT 2010 08281800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.0 ms 08281800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08281800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08281800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 08281800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08281800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08281800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.048/37.114/38.693/3.043 ms 08281800.ms:31.048 37.114 38.693 3.043 08281800.loss:0 08281830.ping:Sat Aug 28 18:30:16 PDT 2010 08281830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=210 ms 08281830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=201 ms 08281830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=222 ms 08281830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=193 ms 08281830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=213 ms 08281830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08281830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 193.028/208.085/222.599/10.146 ms 08281830.ms:193.028 208.085 222.599 10.146 08281830.loss:0 08281900.ping:Sat Aug 28 19:00:16 PDT 2010 08281900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 08281900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08281900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 08281900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=91.0 ms 08281900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 08281900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08281900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.890/49.160/91.013/21.142 ms 08281900.ms:32.890 49.160 91.013 21.142 08281900.loss:0 08281930.ping:Sat Aug 28 19:30:16 PDT 2010 08281930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08281930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=98.4 ms 08281930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=99.4 ms 08281930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=87.6 ms 08281930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=77.8 ms 08281930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=97.2 ms 08281930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08281930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08281930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 77.891/92.135/99.459/8.278 ms 08281930.ms:77.891 92.135 99.459 8.278 08281930.loss:0 08282000.ping:Sat Aug 28 20:00:16 PDT 2010 08282000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08282000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=99.1 ms 08282000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=88.0 ms 08282000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=67.6 ms 08282000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=97.2 ms 08282000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=97.7 ms 08282000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08282000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08282000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 67.607/89.984/99.182/11.866 ms 08282000.ms:67.607 89.984 99.182 11.866 08282000.loss:0 08282030.ping:Sat Aug 28 20:30:16 PDT 2010 08282030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08282030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=263 ms 08282030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=384 ms 08282030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=305 ms 08282030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=285 ms 08282030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=275 ms 08282030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08282030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08282030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 263.438/302.908/384.495/43.051 ms 08282030.ms:263.438 302.908 384.495 43.051 08282030.loss:0 08282100.ping:Sat Aug 28 21:00:16 PDT 2010 08282100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08282100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=94.0 ms 08282100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=291 ms 08282100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=261 ms 08282100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=501 ms 08282100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=511 ms 08282100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08282100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08282100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 94.001/331.977/511.322/157.538 ms 08282100.ms:94.001 331.977 511.322 157.538 08282100.loss:0 08282130.ping:Sat Aug 28 21:30:16 PDT 2010 08282130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08282130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=91.5 ms 08282130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=102 ms 08282130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=93.4 ms 08282130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=83.5 ms 08282130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=93.5 ms 08282130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08282130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08282130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 83.565/92.917/102.522/6.044 ms 08282130.ms:83.565 92.917 102.522 6.044 08282130.loss:0 08282200.ping:Sat Aug 28 22:00:16 PDT 2010 08282200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08282200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=551 ms 08282200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=529 ms 08282200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=579 ms 08282200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=539 ms 08282200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=549 ms 08282200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08282200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4582ms 08282200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 529.731/549.958/579.531/16.727 ms 08282200.ms:529.731 549.958 579.531 16.727 08282200.loss:0 08282230.ping:Sat Aug 28 22:30:16 PDT 2010 08282230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08282230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=99.0 ms 08282230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=98.0 ms 08282230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=107 ms 08282230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=107 ms 08282230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=97.7 ms 08282230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08282230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08282230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 97.716/102.017/107.812/4.608 ms 08282230.ms:97.716 102.017 107.812 4.608 08282230.loss:0 08282300.ping:Sat Aug 28 23:00:16 PDT 2010 08282300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08282300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=93.6 ms 08282300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=101 ms 08282300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=81.9 ms 08282300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=111 ms 08282300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=91.4 ms 08282300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08282300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08282300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 81.902/96.114/111.652/10.042 ms 08282300.ms:81.902 96.114 111.652 10.042 08282300.loss:0 08282330.ping:Sat Aug 28 23:30:16 PDT 2010 08282330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08282330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=91.6 ms 08282330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=99.8 ms 08282330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=89.7 ms 08282330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=89.8 ms 08282330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=89.6 ms 08282330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08282330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08282330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 89.636/92.152/99.859/3.924 ms 08282330.ms:89.636 92.152 99.859 3.924 08282330.loss:0 08290000.ping:Sun Aug 29 00:00:16 PDT 2010 08290000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=101 ms 08290000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=91.7 ms 08290000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=91.9 ms 08290000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=101 ms 08290000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=112 ms 08290000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08290000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 91.754/99.869/112.037/7.539 ms 08290000.ms:91.754 99.869 112.037 7.539 08290000.loss:0 08290030.ping:Sun Aug 29 00:30:16 PDT 2010 08290030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=94.0 ms 08290030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=94.8 ms 08290030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=91.9 ms 08290030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=101 ms 08290030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=92.0 ms 08290030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08290030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 91.928/94.963/101.952/3.683 ms 08290030.ms:91.928 94.963 101.952 3.683 08290030.loss:0 08290100.ping:Sun Aug 29 01:00:16 PDT 2010 08290100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=449 ms 08290100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=450 ms 08290100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=491 ms 08290100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=471 ms 08290100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=491 ms 08290100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08290100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 449.231/470.839/491.670/18.654 ms 08290100.ms:449.231 470.839 491.670 18.654 08290100.loss:0 08290130.ping:Sun Aug 29 01:30:16 PDT 2010 08290130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=91.7 ms 08290130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=92.5 ms 08290130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=93.5 ms 08290130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=84.0 ms 08290130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=73.9 ms 08290130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08290130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 73.916/87.167/93.590/7.433 ms 08290130.ms:73.916 87.167 93.590 7.433 08290130.loss:0 08290200.ping:Sun Aug 29 02:00:16 PDT 2010 08290200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=91.2 ms 08290200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=90.0 ms 08290200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=80.0 ms 08290200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=89.8 ms 08290200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=89.8 ms 08290200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 80.006/88.206/91.259/4.150 ms 08290200.ms:80.006 88.206 91.259 4.150 08290200.loss:0 08290230.ping:Sun Aug 29 02:30:13 PDT 2010 08290230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=92.0 ms 08290230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=90.4 ms 08290230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=90.1 ms 08290230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=100 ms 08290230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=80.2 ms 08290230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 80.269/90.624/100.217/6.354 ms 08290230.ms:80.269 90.624 100.217 6.354 08290230.loss:0 08290300.ping:Sun Aug 29 03:00:16 PDT 2010 08290300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=103 ms 08290300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=92.0 ms 08290300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.0 ms 08290300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=81.7 ms 08290300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=91.7 ms 08290300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 81.702/92.137/103.132/6.784 ms 08290300.ms:81.702 92.137 103.132 6.784 08290300.loss:0 08290330.ping:Sun Aug 29 03:30:15 PDT 2010 08290330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=83.8 ms 08290330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=92.0 ms 08290330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.3 ms 08290330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=82.0 ms 08290330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=92.1 ms 08290330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 82.039/88.486/92.310/4.567 ms 08290330.ms:82.039 88.486 92.310 4.567 08290330.loss:0 08290400.ping:Sun Aug 29 04:00:16 PDT 2010 08290400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=93.5 ms 08290400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=94.3 ms 08290400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.0 ms 08290400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=92.2 ms 08290400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=82.3 ms 08290400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 82.359/90.929/94.394/4.369 ms 08290400.ms:82.359 90.929 94.394 4.369 08290400.loss:0 08290430.ping:Sun Aug 29 04:30:17 PDT 2010 08290430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 08290430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 08290430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=96.3 ms 08290430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=86.3 ms 08290430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=96.2 ms 08290430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.667/70.878/96.311/27.306 ms 08290430.ms:37.667 70.878 96.311 27.306 08290430.loss:0 08290500.ping:Sun Aug 29 05:00:16 PDT 2010 08290500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=94.4 ms 08290500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08290500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.7 ms 08290500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=92.6 ms 08290500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=82.6 ms 08290500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08290500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.017/79.500/94.451/22.633 ms 08290500.ms:35.017 79.500 94.451 22.633 08290500.loss:0 08290530.ping:Sun Aug 29 05:30:16 PDT 2010 08290530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 08290530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=94.7 ms 08290530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 08290530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=102 ms 08290530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=92.8 ms 08290530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08290530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.122/73.582/102.596/28.640 ms 08290530.ms:35.122 73.582 102.596 28.640 08290530.loss:0 08290600.ping:Sun Aug 29 06:00:16 PDT 2010 08290600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=194 ms 08290600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=85.4 ms 08290600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=116 ms 08290600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=216 ms 08290600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=257 ms 08290600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08290600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 85.496/174.033/257.048/63.766 ms 08290600.ms:85.496 174.033 257.048 63.766 08290600.loss:0 08290630.ping:Sun Aug 29 06:30:17 PDT 2010 08290630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 08290630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 08290630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=44.7 ms 08290630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=25.1 ms 08290630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=95.2 ms 08290630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.174/47.511/95.210/24.650 ms 08290630.ms:25.174 47.511 95.210 24.650 08290630.loss:0 08290700.ping:Sun Aug 29 07:00:16 PDT 2010 08290700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 08290700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=86.4 ms 08290700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=84.2 ms 08290700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=103 ms 08290700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=93.7 ms 08290700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.589/80.573/103.855/23.990 ms 08290700.ms:34.589 80.573 103.855 23.990 08290700.loss:0 08290730.ping:Sun Aug 29 07:30:16 PDT 2010 08290730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=82.1 ms 08290730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=90.4 ms 08290730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=80.1 ms 08290730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=90.3 ms 08290730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=90.2 ms 08290730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 80.172/86.684/90.487/4.536 ms 08290730.ms:80.172 86.684 90.487 4.536 08290730.loss:0 08290800.ping:Sun Aug 29 08:00:16 PDT 2010 08290800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=88.2 ms 08290800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 08290800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=86.6 ms 08290800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=96.2 ms 08290800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=106 ms 08290800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.654/82.828/106.289/24.112 ms 08290800.ms:36.654 82.828 106.289 24.112 08290800.loss:0 08290830.ping:Sun Aug 29 08:30:16 PDT 2010 08290830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=23.0 ms 08290830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=94.5 ms 08290830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.5 ms 08290830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=92.2 ms 08290830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=92.2 ms 08290830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.008/78.919/94.534/27.971 ms 08290830.ms:23.008 78.919 94.534 27.971 08290830.loss:0 08290900.ping:Sun Aug 29 09:00:17 PDT 2010 08290900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=106 ms 08290900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=94.6 ms 08290900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=94.2 ms 08290900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=94.4 ms 08290900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=84.3 ms 08290900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08290900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 84.358/94.763/106.062/6.873 ms 08290900.ms:84.358 94.763 106.062 6.873 08290900.loss:0 08290930.ping:Sun Aug 29 09:30:16 PDT 2010 08290930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08290930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=183 ms 08290930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 08290930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.5 ms 08290930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=92.0 ms 08290930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=92.1 ms 08290930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08290930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08290930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.767/98.987/183.394/47.718 ms 08290930.ms:34.767 98.987 183.394 47.718 08290930.loss:0 08291000.ping:Sun Aug 29 10:00:17 PDT 2010 08291000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=94.0 ms 08291000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=84.9 ms 08291000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=95.7 ms 08291000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=95.8 ms 08291000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=95.8 ms 08291000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08291000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 84.968/93.286/95.874/4.231 ms 08291000.ms:84.968 93.286 95.874 4.231 08291000.loss:0 08291030.ping:Sun Aug 29 10:30:16 PDT 2010 08291030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=236 ms 08291030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=215 ms 08291030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=215 ms 08291030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=235 ms 08291030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=215 ms 08291030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08291030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 215.201/223.593/236.731/10.118 ms 08291030.ms:215.201 223.593 236.731 10.118 08291030.loss:0 08291100.ping:Sun Aug 29 11:00:16 PDT 2010 08291100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=87.8 ms 08291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=125 ms 08291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=86.0 ms 08291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=85.7 ms 08291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=85.7 ms 08291100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08291100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 85.734/94.110/125.219/15.577 ms 08291100.ms:85.734 94.110 125.219 15.577 08291100.loss:0 08291130.ping:Sun Aug 29 11:30:16 PDT 2010 08291130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=90.5 ms 08291130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=90.0 ms 08291130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=91.2 ms 08291130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=91.2 ms 08291130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=101 ms 08291130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08291130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 90.018/92.849/101.192/4.214 ms 08291130.ms:90.018 92.849 101.192 4.214 08291130.loss:0 08291200.ping:Sun Aug 29 12:00:16 PDT 2010 08291200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=636 ms 08291200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=599 ms 08291200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=786 ms 08291200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=596 ms 08291200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=556 ms 08291200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 5450ms 08291200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 556.839/635.253/786.655/79.821 ms 08291200.ms:556.839 635.253 786.655 79.821 08291200.loss:0 08291230.ping:Sun Aug 29 12:30:16 PDT 2010 08291230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=262 ms 08291230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=310 ms 08291230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=200 ms 08291230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=240 ms 08291230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=260 ms 08291230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08291230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 200.857/254.923/310.785/35.622 ms 08291230.ms:200.857 254.923 310.785 35.622 08291230.loss:0 08291300.ping:Sun Aug 29 13:00:16 PDT 2010 08291300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=276 ms 08291300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=237 ms 08291300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=278 ms 08291300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=208 ms 08291300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=248 ms 08291300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08291300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 208.307/249.914/278.833/26.215 ms 08291300.ms:208.307 249.914 278.833 26.215 08291300.loss:0 08291330.ping:Sun Aug 29 13:30:16 PDT 2010 08291330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=358 ms 08291330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=259 ms 08291330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=290 ms 08291330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=290 ms 08291330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=400 ms 08291330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08291330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 259.914/320.253/400.818/51.705 ms 08291330.ms:259.914 320.253 400.818 51.705 08291330.loss:0 08291400.ping:Sun Aug 29 14:00:16 PDT 2010 08291400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=97.4 ms 08291400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=88.6 ms 08291400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=95.3 ms 08291400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=75.5 ms 08291400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=95.4 ms 08291400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08291400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 75.523/90.484/97.419/8.056 ms 08291400.ms:75.523 90.484 97.419 8.056 08291400.loss:0 08291430.ping:Sun Aug 29 14:30:17 PDT 2010 08291430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=92.0 ms 08291430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 08291430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=94.1 ms 08291430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=94.2 ms 08291430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=84.2 ms 08291430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08291430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.948/79.529/94.221/23.577 ms 08291430.ms:32.948 79.529 94.221 23.577 08291430.loss:0 08291500.ping:Sun Aug 29 15:00:16 PDT 2010 08291500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=111 ms 08291500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=89.7 ms 08291500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=89.3 ms 08291500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=120 ms 08291500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=79.5 ms 08291500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08291500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 79.598/98.032/120.162/15.152 ms 08291500.ms:79.598 98.032 120.162 15.152 08291500.loss:0 08291530.ping:Sun Aug 29 15:30:16 PDT 2010 08291530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=176 ms 08291530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=177 ms 08291530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=338 ms 08291530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=188 ms 08291530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=98.6 ms 08291530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08291530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 98.629/195.985/338.521/78.193 ms 08291530.ms:98.629 195.985 338.521 78.193 08291530.loss:0 08291600.ping:Sun Aug 29 16:00:16 PDT 2010 08291600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=93.8 ms 08291600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=84.5 ms 08291600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=125 ms 08291600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=85.1 ms 08291600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=65.6 ms 08291600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08291600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 65.636/90.928/125.383/19.541 ms 08291600.ms:65.636 90.928 125.383 19.541 08291600.loss:0 08291630.ping:Sun Aug 29 16:30:16 PDT 2010 08291630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=100 ms 08291630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=88.1 ms 08291630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=98.1 ms 08291630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=67.7 ms 08291630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=98.8 ms 08291630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08291630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 67.780/90.603/100.050/12.180 ms 08291630.ms:67.780 90.603 100.050 12.180 08291630.loss:0 08291700.ping:Sun Aug 29 17:00:16 PDT 2010 08291700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=289 ms 08291700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 08291700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 08291700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=28.5 ms 08291700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=68.5 ms 08291700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08291700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.501/92.473/289.330/99.349 ms 08291700.ms:28.501 92.473 289.330 99.349 08291700.loss:0 08291730.ping:Sun Aug 29 17:30:16 PDT 2010 08291730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=219 ms 08291730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=280 ms 08291730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=161 ms 08291730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=282 ms 08291730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=331 ms 08291730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08291730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 161.031/254.962/331.645/58.833 ms 08291730.ms:161.031 254.962 331.645 58.833 08291730.loss:0 08291800.ping:Sun Aug 29 18:00:16 PDT 2010 08291800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=532 ms 08291800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=469 ms 08291800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=540 ms 08291800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=490 ms 08291800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=530 ms 08291800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4561ms 08291800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 469.481/512.870/540.347/27.712 ms 08291800.ms:469.481 512.870 540.347 27.712 08291800.loss:0 08291830.ping:Sun Aug 29 18:30:16 PDT 2010 08291830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=103 ms 08291830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=84.7 ms 08291830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=105 ms 08291830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08291830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=115 ms 08291830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08291830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.034/89.089/115.586/28.341 ms 08291830.ms:36.034 89.089 115.586 28.341 08291830.loss:0 08291900.ping:Sun Aug 29 19:00:16 PDT 2010 08291900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=86.1 ms 08291900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=104 ms 08291900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=84.3 ms 08291900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=94.0 ms 08291900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=113 ms 08291900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08291900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 84.394/96.503/113.814/11.125 ms 08291900.ms:84.394 96.503 113.814 11.125 08291900.loss:0 08291930.ping:Sun Aug 29 19:30:16 PDT 2010 08291930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08291930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=211 ms 08291930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=92.5 ms 08291930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.4 ms 08291930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=102 ms 08291930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=92.1 ms 08291930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08291930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08291930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 92.183/118.193/211.627/46.872 ms 08291930.ms:92.183 118.193 211.627 46.872 08291930.loss:0 08292000.ping:Sun Aug 29 20:00:16 PDT 2010 08292000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08292000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=92.6 ms 08292000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=100 ms 08292000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=100 ms 08292000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=93.0 ms 08292000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=92.3 ms 08292000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08292000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08292000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 92.359/95.856/100.760/3.906 ms 08292000.ms:92.359 95.856 100.760 3.906 08292000.loss:0 08292030.ping:Sun Aug 29 20:30:16 PDT 2010 08292030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08292030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=88.6 ms 08292030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=99.3 ms 08292030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=96.8 ms 08292030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=86.8 ms 08292030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=96.8 ms 08292030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08292030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08292030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 86.805/93.691/99.335/4.987 ms 08292030.ms:86.805 93.691 99.335 4.987 08292030.loss:0 08292100.ping:Sun Aug 29 21:00:16 PDT 2010 08292100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08292100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=84.8 ms 08292100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=105 ms 08292100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=86.6 ms 08292100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=97.1 ms 08292100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=87.3 ms 08292100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08292100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08292100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 84.852/92.373/105.888/8.016 ms 08292100.ms:84.852 92.373 105.888 8.016 08292100.loss:0 08292130.ping:Sun Aug 29 21:30:16 PDT 2010 08292130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08292130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 08292130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 08292130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.9 ms 08292130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 08292130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 08292130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08292130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08292130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.956/37.389/43.990/4.582 ms 08292130.ms:32.956 37.389 43.990 4.582 08292130.loss:0 08292200.ping:Sun Aug 29 22:00:16 PDT 2010 08292200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08292200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.2 ms 08292200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=63.2 ms 08292200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08292200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 08292200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 08292200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08292200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08292200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.208/43.213/63.288/10.504 ms 08292200.ms:32.208 43.213 63.288 10.504 08292200.loss:0 08292230.ping:Sun Aug 29 22:30:16 PDT 2010 08292230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08292230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08292230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 08292230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 08292230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 08292230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 08292230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08292230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08292230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.171/37.626/38.379/0.864 ms 08292230.ms:36.171 37.626 38.379 0.864 08292230.loss:0 08292300.ping:Sun Aug 29 23:00:16 PDT 2010 08292300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08292300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.6 ms 08292300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08292300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08292300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 08292300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08292300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08292300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 08292300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.072/38.852/49.652/5.400 ms 08292300.ms:36.072 38.852 49.652 5.400 08292300.loss:0 08292330.ping:Sun Aug 29 23:30:16 PDT 2010 08292330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08292330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.3 ms 08292330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.2 ms 08292330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 08292330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 08292330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 08292330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08292330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08292330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.267/40.263/50.338/6.350 ms 08292330.ms:30.267 40.263 50.338 6.350 08292330.loss:0 08300000.ping:Mon Aug 30 00:00:16 PDT 2010 08300000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=129 ms 08300000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=170 ms 08300000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=177 ms 08300000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=157 ms 08300000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=177 ms 08300000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08300000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 129.388/162.356/177.087/17.984 ms 08300000.ms:129.388 162.356 177.087 17.984 08300000.loss:0 08300030.ping:Mon Aug 30 00:30:16 PDT 2010 08300030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=280 ms 08300030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=211 ms 08300030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=201 ms 08300030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=201 ms 08300030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=201 ms 08300030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08300030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.025/219.078/280.991/31.202 ms 08300030.ms:201.025 219.078 280.991 31.202 08300030.loss:0 08300100.ping:Mon Aug 30 01:00:16 PDT 2010 08300100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08300100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08300100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 08300100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=86.7 ms 08300100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08300100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08300100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.845/46.365/86.726/20.199 ms 08300100.ms:34.845 46.365 86.726 20.199 08300100.loss:0 08300130.ping:Mon Aug 30 01:30:14 PDT 2010 08300130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08300130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=91.9 ms 08300130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 08300130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 08300130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 08300130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08300130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.793/46.361/91.936/22.989 ms 08300130.ms:32.793 46.361 91.936 22.989 08300130.loss:0 08300200.ping:Mon Aug 30 02:00:16 PDT 2010 08300200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 08300200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 08300200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 08300200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08300200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 08300200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08300200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.674/34.247/34.951/0.854 ms 08300200.ms:32.674 34.247 34.951 0.854 08300200.loss:0 08300230.ping:Mon Aug 30 02:30:17 PDT 2010 08300230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=73.2 ms 08300230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08300230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 08300230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.9 ms 08300230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08300230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08300230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.022/49.571/73.211/12.406 ms 08300230.ms:41.022 49.571 73.211 12.406 08300230.loss:0 08300300.ping:Mon Aug 30 03:00:16 PDT 2010 08300300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.2 ms 08300300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08300300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08300300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08300300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 08300300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08300300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.092/41.736/43.205/0.748 ms 08300300.ms:41.092 41.736 43.205 0.748 08300300.loss:0 08300330.ping:Mon Aug 30 03:30:17 PDT 2010 08300330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=509 ms 08300330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=680 ms 08300330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=531 ms 08300330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=501 ms 08300330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=471 ms 08300330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08300330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 471.805/539.105/680.673/73.331 ms 08300330.ms:471.805 539.105 680.673 73.331 08300330.loss:0 08300400.ping:Mon Aug 30 04:00:16 PDT 2010 08300400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 08300400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 08300400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 08300400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 08300400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 08300400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08300400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.633/36.039/37.417/0.690 ms 08300400.ms:35.633 36.039 37.417 0.690 08300400.loss:0 08300430.ping:Mon Aug 30 04:30:16 PDT 2010 08300430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 08300430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 08300430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.9 ms 08300430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 08300430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 08300430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08300430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.644/38.104/45.919/3.953 ms 08300430.ms:35.644 38.104 45.919 3.953 08300430.loss:0 08300500.ping:Mon Aug 30 05:00:16 PDT 2010 08300500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.8 ms 08300500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.8 ms 08300500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 08300500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08300500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08300500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08300500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.818/41.724/44.845/3.151 ms 08300500.ms:35.818 41.724 44.845 3.151 08300500.loss:0 08300530.ping:Mon Aug 30 05:30:16 PDT 2010 08300530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 08300530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08300530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 08300530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 08300530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=64.3 ms 08300530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08300530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.859/40.505/64.344/11.941 ms 08300530.ms:33.859 40.505 64.344 11.941 08300530.loss:0 08300600.ping:Mon Aug 30 06:00:17 PDT 2010 08300600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08300600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 08300600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 08300600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=24.2 ms 08300600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 08300600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08300600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.221/32.666/36.179/4.288 ms 08300600.ms:24.221 32.666 36.179 4.288 08300600.loss:0 08300630.ping:Mon Aug 30 06:30:14 PDT 2010 08300630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 08300630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=50.4 ms 08300630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 08300630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 08300630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=50.5 ms 08300630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08300630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.608/44.911/50.596/4.628 ms 08300630.ms:40.608 44.911 50.596 4.628 08300630.loss:0 08300700.ping:Mon Aug 30 07:00:17 PDT 2010 08300700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 08300700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 08300700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 08300700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 08300700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.3 ms 08300700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08300700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.971/35.564/44.304/4.472 ms 08300700.ms:31.971 35.564 44.304 4.472 08300700.loss:0 08300730.ping:Mon Aug 30 07:30:16 PDT 2010 08300730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.4 ms 08300730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 08300730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=50.7 ms 08300730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 08300730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=50.2 ms 08300730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08300730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.416/42.853/50.720/7.152 ms 08300730.ms:31.416 42.853 50.720 7.152 08300730.loss:0 08300800.ping:Mon Aug 30 08:00:16 PDT 2010 08300800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 08300800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=61.0 ms 08300800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 08300800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 08300800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=182 ms 08300800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08300800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.076/71.815/182.919/56.324 ms 08300800.ms:33.076 71.815 182.919 56.324 08300800.loss:0 08300830.ping:Mon Aug 30 08:30:16 PDT 2010 08300830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 08300830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 08300830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=60.0 ms 08300830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=60.4 ms 08300830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 08300830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08300830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.745/49.419/60.422/8.883 ms 08300830.ms:40.745 49.419 60.422 8.883 08300830.loss:0 08300900.ping:Mon Aug 30 09:00:16 PDT 2010 08300900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 08300900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 08300900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.4 ms 08300900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 08300900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 08300900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08300900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.527/40.641/52.443/7.133 ms 08300900.ms:32.527 40.641 52.443 7.133 08300900.loss:0 08300930.ping:Mon Aug 30 09:30:16 PDT 2010 08300930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08300930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=27.8 ms 08300930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08300930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 08300930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 08300930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=25.6 ms 08300930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08300930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08300930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.652/32.357/36.440/4.640 ms 08300930.ms:25.652 32.357 36.440 4.640 08300930.loss:0 08301000.ping:Mon Aug 30 10:00:16 PDT 2010 08301000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=51.9 ms 08301000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 08301000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08301000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 08301000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 08301000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08301000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.542/42.330/51.967/4.825 ms 08301000.ms:39.542 42.330 51.967 4.825 08301000.loss:0 08301030.ping:Mon Aug 30 10:30:17 PDT 2010 08301030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 08301030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08301030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08301030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 08301030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08301030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08301030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.382/39.860/41.562/3.244 ms 08301030.ms:33.382 39.860 41.562 3.244 08301030.loss:0 08301100.ping:Mon Aug 30 11:00:16 PDT 2010 08301100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=27.5 ms 08301100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 08301100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 08301100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08301100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 08301100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08301100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.533/36.921/39.756/4.716 ms 08301100.ms:27.533 36.921 39.756 4.716 08301100.loss:0 08301130.ping:Mon Aug 30 11:30:17 PDT 2010 08301130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=271 ms 08301130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=237 ms 08301130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=278 ms 08301130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=257 ms 08301130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=237 ms 08301130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08301130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 237.792/256.609/278.063/16.661 ms 08301130.ms:237.792 256.609 278.063 16.661 08301130.loss:0 08301200.ping:Mon Aug 30 12:00:16 PDT 2010 08301200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 08301200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 08301200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 08301200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=53.8 ms 08301200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 08301200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08301200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.556/39.898/53.805/7.837 ms 08301200.ms:33.556 39.898 53.805 7.837 08301200.loss:0 08301230.ping:Mon Aug 30 12:30:16 PDT 2010 08301230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08301230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 08301230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=79.6 ms 08301230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=29.9 ms 08301230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.5 ms 08301230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08301230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.916/47.790/79.683/17.116 ms 08301230.ms:29.916 47.790 79.683 17.116 08301230.loss:0 08301300.ping:Mon Aug 30 13:00:16 PDT 2010 08301300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=708 ms 08301300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=598 ms 08301300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=646 ms 08301300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=776 ms 08301300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=855 ms 08301300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 7122ms 08301300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 598.898/717.147/855.924/91.443 ms 08301300.ms:598.898 717.147 855.924 91.443 08301300.loss:0 08301330.ping:Mon Aug 30 13:30:16 PDT 2010 08301330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 08301330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 08301330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=124 ms 08301330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=74.8 ms 08301330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.8 ms 08301330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08301330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.494/63.092/124.506/33.970 ms 08301330.ms:34.494 63.092 124.506 33.970 08301330.loss:0 08301400.ping:Mon Aug 30 14:00:16 PDT 2010 08301400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=79.7 ms 08301400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=81.4 ms 08301400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.1 ms 08301400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=422 ms 08301400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=562 ms 08301400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08301400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 79.761/247.592/562.200/204.694 ms 08301400.ms:79.761 247.592 562.200 204.694 08301400.loss:0 08301430.ping:Mon Aug 30 14:30:13 PDT 2010 08301430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=69.0 ms 08301430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=87.9 ms 08301430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=88.4 ms 08301430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 08301430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.0 ms 08301430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08301430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.702/66.234/88.403/20.588 ms 08301430.ms:37.702 66.234 88.403 20.588 08301430.loss:0 08301500.ping:Mon Aug 30 15:00:16 PDT 2010 08301500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=883 ms 08301500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=450 ms 08301500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=469 ms 08301500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=469 ms 08301500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=359 ms 08301500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 5973ms 08301500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 359.462/526.564/883.227/182.957 ms 08301500.ms:359.462 526.564 883.227 182.957 08301500.loss:0 08301530.ping:Mon Aug 30 15:30:16 PDT 2010 08301530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 08301530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 08301530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 08301530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 08301530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 08301530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08301530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.511/40.540/43.690/3.162 ms 08301530.ms:34.511 40.540 43.690 3.162 08301530.loss:0 08301600.ping:Mon Aug 30 16:00:17 PDT 2010 08301600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=369 ms 08301600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=507 ms 08301600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=348 ms 08301600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=288 ms 08301600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=377 ms 08301600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08301600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 288.005/378.202/507.741/71.962 ms 08301600.ms:288.005 378.202 507.741 71.962 08301600.loss:0 08301630.ping:Mon Aug 30 16:30:16 PDT 2010 08301630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=90.0 ms 08301630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.2 ms 08301630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=29.6 ms 08301630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 08301630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 08301630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08301630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.646/45.974/90.046/22.488 ms 08301630.ms:29.646 45.974 90.046 22.488 08301630.loss:0 08301700.ping:Mon Aug 30 17:00:16 PDT 2010 08301700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.0 ms 08301700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=29.3 ms 08301700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 08301700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 08301700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 08301700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08301700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.022/37.508/49.704/7.999 ms 08301700.ms:28.022 37.508 49.704 7.999 08301700.loss:0 08301730.ping:Mon Aug 30 17:30:16 PDT 2010 08301730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=48.7 ms 08301730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08301730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 08301730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=56.4 ms 08301730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 08301730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08301730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.306/42.959/56.441/8.238 ms 08301730.ms:36.306 42.959 56.441 8.238 08301730.loss:0 08301800.ping:Mon Aug 30 18:00:16 PDT 2010 08301800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 08301800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=24.9 ms 08301800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=56.4 ms 08301800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.5 ms 08301800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=26.3 ms 08301800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08301800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.990/37.625/56.411/12.121 ms 08301800.ms:24.990 37.625 56.411 12.121 08301800.loss:0 08301830.ping:Mon Aug 30 18:30:16 PDT 2010 08301830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08301830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.0 ms 08301830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=77.0 ms 08301830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 08301830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=46.6 ms 08301830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08301830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.887/48.394/77.029/15.043 ms 08301830.ms:34.887 48.394 77.029 15.043 08301830.loss:0 08301900.ping:Mon Aug 30 19:00:16 PDT 2010 08301900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.0 ms 08301900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 08301900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 08301900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=53.2 ms 08301900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 08301900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08301900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.960/41.488/53.204/7.634 ms 08301900.ms:32.960 41.488 53.204 7.634 08301900.loss:0 08301930.ping:Mon Aug 30 19:30:16 PDT 2010 08301930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08301930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08301930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08301930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.4 ms 08301930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.1 ms 08301930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 08301930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08301930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08301930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.495/35.694/45.161/6.261 ms 08301930.ms:25.495 35.694 45.161 6.261 08301930.loss:0 08302000.ping:Mon Aug 30 20:00:08 PDT 2010 08302000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08302000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=122 ms 08302000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 08302000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=29.5 ms 08302000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=100 ms 08302000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=29.5 ms 08302000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08302000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08302000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.511/64.307/122.291/39.126 ms 08302000.ms:29.511 64.307 122.291 39.126 08302000.loss:0 08302030.ping:Mon Aug 30 20:30:16 PDT 2010 08302030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08302030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=31.0 ms 08302030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.2 ms 08302030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 08302030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 08302030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=29.7 ms 08302030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08302030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08302030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.730/34.079/39.684/4.596 ms 08302030.ms:29.730 34.079 39.684 4.596 08302030.loss:0 08302100.ping:Mon Aug 30 21:00:16 PDT 2010 08302100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08302100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=27.0 ms 08302100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 08302100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.2 ms 08302100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=25.1 ms 08302100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 08302100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08302100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08302100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.192/29.655/35.495/4.739 ms 08302100.ms:25.192 29.655 35.495 4.739 08302100.loss:0 08302130.ping:Mon Aug 30 21:30:16 PDT 2010 08302130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08302130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=398 ms 08302130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=390 ms 08302130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=391 ms 08302130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=401 ms 08302130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=371 ms 08302130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08302130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08302130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 371.216/390.551/401.227/10.606 ms 08302130.ms:371.216 390.551 401.227 10.606 08302130.loss:0 08302200.ping:Mon Aug 30 22:00:16 PDT 2010 08302200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08302200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 08302200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.2 ms 08302200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 08302200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.4 ms 08302200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=25.1 ms 08302200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08302200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08302200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.153/37.554/45.428/7.504 ms 08302200.ms:25.153 37.554 45.428 7.504 08302200.loss:0 08302230.ping:Mon Aug 30 22:30:16 PDT 2010 08302230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08302230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 08302230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 08302230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08302230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.8 ms 08302230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 08302230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08302230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08302230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.825/38.258/44.805/4.672 ms 08302230.ms:33.825 38.258 44.805 4.672 08302230.loss:0 08302300.ping:Mon Aug 30 23:00:16 PDT 2010 08302300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08302300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=24.4 ms 08302300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=25.1 ms 08302300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=26.5 ms 08302300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.5 ms 08302300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 08302300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08302300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08302300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.457/31.830/46.598/8.557 ms 08302300.ms:24.457 31.830 46.598 8.557 08302300.loss:0 08302330.ping:Mon Aug 30 23:30:16 PDT 2010 08302330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08302330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=59.0 ms 08302330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 08302330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 08302330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08302330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=28.6 ms 08302330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08302330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08302330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.697/40.693/59.030/9.936 ms 08302330.ms:28.697 40.693 59.030 9.936 08302330.loss:0 08310000.ping:Tue Aug 31 00:00:16 PDT 2010 08310000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=234 ms 08310000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=246 ms 08310000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=236 ms 08310000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=236 ms 08310000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=216 ms 08310000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08310000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 216.803/234.246/246.000/9.566 ms 08310000.ms:216.803 234.246 246.000 9.566 08310000.loss:0 08310030.ping:Tue Aug 31 00:30:16 PDT 2010 08310030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.7 ms 08310030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 08310030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 08310030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08310030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08310030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08310030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.075/39.390/44.690/3.969 ms 08310030.ms:36.075 39.390 44.690 3.969 08310030.loss:0 08310100.ping:Tue Aug 31 01:00:16 PDT 2010 08310100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 08310100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 08310100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08310100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 08310100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 08310100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08310100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.185/35.386/41.722/3.194 ms 08310100.ms:33.185 35.386 41.722 3.194 08310100.loss:0 08310130.ping:Tue Aug 31 01:30:17 PDT 2010 08310130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 08310130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 08310130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 08310130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 08310130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=25.7 ms 08310130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08310130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.726/34.850/38.819/4.695 ms 08310130.ms:25.726 34.850 38.819 4.695 08310130.loss:0 08310200.ping:Tue Aug 31 02:00:16 PDT 2010 08310200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 08310200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 08310200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08310200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 08310200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=28.3 ms 08310200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08310200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.306/36.960/41.118/4.455 ms 08310200.ms:28.306 36.960 41.118 4.455 08310200.loss:0 08310230.ping:Tue Aug 31 02:30:16 PDT 2010 08310230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 08310230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 08310230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 08310230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=62.8 ms 08310230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 08310230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08310230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.142/42.360/62.886/11.129 ms 08310230.ms:32.142 42.360 62.886 11.129 08310230.loss:0 08310300.ping:Tue Aug 31 03:00:16 PDT 2010 08310300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=75.2 ms 08310300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 08310300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 08310300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 08310300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=87.0 ms 08310300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08310300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.111/54.595/87.062/22.000 ms 08310300.ms:36.111 54.595 87.062 22.000 08310300.loss:0 08310330.ping:Tue Aug 31 03:30:16 PDT 2010 08310330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08310330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 08310330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 08310330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 08310330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 08310330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08310330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.350/38.111/39.717/0.836 ms 08310330.ms:37.350 38.111 39.717 0.836 08310330.loss:0 08310400.ping:Tue Aug 31 04:00:16 PDT 2010 08310400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=226 ms 08310400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=235 ms 08310400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=235 ms 08310400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=195 ms 08310400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=225 ms 08310400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08310400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 195.798/224.040/235.927/14.758 ms 08310400.ms:195.798 224.040 235.927 14.758 08310400.loss:0 08310430.ping:Tue Aug 31 04:30:17 PDT 2010 08310430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=60.8 ms 08310430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.1 ms 08310430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=30.6 ms 08310430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08310430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.1 ms 08310430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08310430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.642/38.922/60.825/11.608 ms 08310430.ms:30.642 38.922 60.825 11.608 08310430.loss:0 08310500.ping:Tue Aug 31 05:00:16 PDT 2010 08310500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 08310500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 08310500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=68.7 ms 08310500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 08310500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 08310500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08310500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.374/43.819/68.763/12.490 ms 08310500.ms:36.374 43.819 68.763 12.490 08310500.loss:0 08310530.ping:Tue Aug 31 05:30:16 PDT 2010 08310530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08310530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=28.5 ms 08310530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 08310530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.8 ms 08310530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 08310530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08310530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.562/39.059/48.864/6.488 ms 08310530.ms:28.562 39.059 48.864 6.488 08310530.loss:0 08310600.ping:Tue Aug 31 06:00:17 PDT 2010 08310600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 08310600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 08310600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 08310600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08310600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 08310600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08310600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.902/36.178/42.700/3.282 ms 08310600.ms:33.902 36.178 42.700 3.282 08310600.loss:0 08310630.ping:Tue Aug 31 06:30:16 PDT 2010 08310630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=239 ms 08310630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=297 ms 08310630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=307 ms 08310630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=217 ms 08310630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=217 ms 08310630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08310630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 217.300/255.781/307.344/39.034 ms 08310630.ms:217.300 255.781 307.344 39.034 08310630.loss:0 08310700.ping:Tue Aug 31 07:00:16 PDT 2010 08310700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=383 ms 08310700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=334 ms 08310700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=395 ms 08310700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=356 ms 08310700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=356 ms 08310700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08310700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 334.705/365.417/395.629/21.707 ms 08310700.ms:334.705 365.417 395.629 21.707 08310700.loss:0 08310730.ping:Tue Aug 31 07:30:16 PDT 2010 08310730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 08310730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.7 ms 08310730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 08310730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 08310730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.4 ms 08310730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08310730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.077/39.470/45.729/4.998 ms 08310730.ms:35.077 39.470 45.729 4.998 08310730.loss:0 08310800.ping:Tue Aug 31 08:00:16 PDT 2010 08310800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 08310800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 08310800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=134 ms 08310800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 08310800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=73.7 ms 08310800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08310800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.481/62.155/134.198/39.132 ms 08310800.ms:33.481 62.155 134.198 39.132 08310800.loss:0 08310830.ping:Tue Aug 31 08:30:16 PDT 2010 08310830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 08310830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=23.2 ms 08310830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08310830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08310830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 08310830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08310830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.231/37.212/42.014/7.026 ms 08310830.ms:23.231 37.212 42.014 7.026 08310830.loss:0 08310900.ping:Tue Aug 31 09:00:16 PDT 2010 08310900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 08310900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 08310900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 08310900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 08310900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=28.3 ms 08310900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08310900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.310/35.469/38.098/3.666 ms 08310900.ms:28.310 35.469 38.098 3.666 08310900.loss:0 08310930.ping:Tue Aug 31 09:30:16 PDT 2010 08310930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08310930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 08310930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=208 ms 08310930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=189 ms 08310930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=31.6 ms 08310930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 08310930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08310930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08310930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.667/101.260/208.054/79.841 ms 08310930.ms:31.667 101.260 208.054 79.841 08310930.loss:0 08311000.ping:Tue Aug 31 10:00:16 PDT 2010 08311000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=273 ms 08311000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=274 ms 08311000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=285 ms 08311000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=355 ms 08311000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=376 ms 08311000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3996ms 08311000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 273.130/312.884/376.388/43.992 ms 08311000.ms:273.130 312.884 376.388 43.992 08311000.loss:0 08311030.ping:Tue Aug 31 10:30:16 PDT 2010 08311030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 08311030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 08311030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=28.7 ms 08311030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=78.9 ms 08311030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 08311030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08311030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.751/45.278/78.905/17.344 ms 08311030.ms:28.751 45.278 78.905 17.344 08311030.loss:0 08311100.ping:Tue Aug 31 11:00:16 PDT 2010 08311100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=351 ms 08311100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=440 ms 08311100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=452 ms 08311100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=432 ms 08311100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=532 ms 08311100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08311100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 351.542/442.062/532.954/57.695 ms 08311100.ms:351.542 442.062 532.954 57.695 08311100.loss:0 08311130.ping:Tue Aug 31 11:30:17 PDT 2010 08311130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 08311130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08311130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 08311130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 08311130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 08311130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08311130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.749/34.879/36.478/0.963 ms 08311130.ms:33.749 34.879 36.478 0.963 08311130.loss:0 08311200.ping:Tue Aug 31 12:00:16 PDT 2010 08311200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=69.4 ms 08311200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=28.0 ms 08311200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 08311200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 08311200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 08311200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08311200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.038/42.310/69.473/14.122 ms 08311200.ms:28.038 42.310 69.473 14.122 08311200.loss:0 08311230.ping:Tue Aug 31 12:30:16 PDT 2010 08311230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=293 ms 08311230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=382 ms 08311230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=312 ms 08311230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=331 ms 08311230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=312 ms 08311230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08311230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 293.531/326.369/382.091/30.400 ms 08311230.ms:293.531 326.369 382.091 30.400 08311230.loss:0 08311300.ping:Tue Aug 31 13:00:17 PDT 2010 08311300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=632 ms 08311300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=649 ms 08311300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=578 ms 08311300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=508 ms 08311300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=520 ms 08311300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4754ms 08311300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 508.542/577.922/649.318/56.770 ms 08311300.ms:508.542 577.922 649.318 56.770 08311300.loss:0 08311330.ping:Tue Aug 31 13:30:16 PDT 2010 08311330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 08311330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 08311330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 08311330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08311330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 08311330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08311330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.175/36.417/43.181/3.394 ms 08311330.ms:34.175 36.417 43.181 3.394 08311330.loss:0 08311400.ping:Tue Aug 31 14:00:16 PDT 2010 08311400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.5 ms 08311400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=31.2 ms 08311400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.4 ms 08311400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=81.4 ms 08311400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 08311400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08311400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.221/49.780/81.466/17.106 ms 08311400.ms:31.221 49.780 81.466 17.106 08311400.loss:0 08311430.ping:Tue Aug 31 14:30:16 PDT 2010 08311430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 08311430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=50.1 ms 08311430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=50.7 ms 08311430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 08311430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=30.0 ms 08311430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08311430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.047/42.732/50.736/7.542 ms 08311430.ms:30.047 42.732 50.736 7.542 08311430.loss:0 08311500.ping:Tue Aug 31 15:00:17 PDT 2010 08311500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=47.7 ms 08311500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 08311500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.5 ms 08311500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 08311500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 08311500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08311500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.632/42.135/48.530/4.910 ms 08311500.ms:37.632 42.135 48.530 4.910 08311500.loss:0 08311530.ping:Tue Aug 31 15:30:16 PDT 2010 08311530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08311530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08311530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 08311530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 08311530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 08311530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 08311530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.101/41.303/41.463/0.122 ms 08311530.ms:41.101 41.303 41.463 0.122 08311530.loss:0 08311600.ping:Tue Aug 31 16:00:16 PDT 2010 08311600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 08311600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 08311600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.1 ms 08311600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 08311600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 08311600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08311600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.414/40.065/48.143/4.114 ms 08311600.ms:37.414 40.065 48.143 4.114 08311600.loss:0 08311630.ping:Tue Aug 31 16:30:15 PDT 2010 08311630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08311630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08311630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=29.8 ms 08311630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 08311630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 08311630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08311630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.820/38.095/41.404/4.194 ms 08311630.ms:29.820 38.095 41.404 4.194 08311630.loss:0 08311700.ping:Tue Aug 31 17:00:16 PDT 2010 08311700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 08311700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 08311700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08311700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08311700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 08311700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08311700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.558/41.094/49.718/4.387 ms 08311700.ms:37.558 41.094 49.718 4.387 08311700.loss:0 08311730.ping:Tue Aug 31 17:30:16 PDT 2010 08311730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 08311730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08311730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08311730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08311730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 08311730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08311730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.237/35.739/37.540/0.901 ms 08311730.ms:35.237 35.739 37.540 0.901 08311730.loss:0 08311800.ping:Tue Aug 31 18:00:13 PDT 2010 08311800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 08311800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 08311800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08311800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 08311800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 08311800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08311800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.874/36.476/42.867/3.237 ms 08311800.ms:33.874 36.476 42.867 3.237 08311800.loss:0 08311830.ping:Tue Aug 31 18:30:16 PDT 2010 08311830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 08311830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=22.8 ms 08311830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 08311830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=63.2 ms 08311830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 08311830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 08311830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.842/38.853/63.212/13.714 ms 08311830.ms:22.842 38.853 63.212 13.714 08311830.loss:0 08311900.ping:Tue Aug 31 19:00:16 PDT 2010 08311900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=277 ms 08311900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=195 ms 08311900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=275 ms 08311900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=315 ms 08311900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=315 ms 08311900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08311900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 195.518/275.781/315.406/43.777 ms 08311900.ms:195.518 275.781 315.406 43.777 08311900.loss:0 08311930.ping:Tue Aug 31 19:30:16 PDT 2010 08311930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08311930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=359 ms 08311930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=387 ms 08311930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=387 ms 08311930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=477 ms 08311930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=357 ms 08311930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08311930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08311930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 357.483/394.060/477.728/43.837 ms 08311930.ms:357.483 394.060 477.728 43.837 08311930.loss:0 08312000.ping:Tue Aug 31 20:00:16 PDT 2010 08312000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08312000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.9 ms 08312000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 08312000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 08312000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=208 ms 08312000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=357 ms 08312000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08312000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 08312000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.640/137.287/357.986/128.146 ms 08312000.ms:36.640 137.287 357.986 128.146 08312000.loss:0 08312030.ping:Tue Aug 31 20:30:16 PDT 2010 08312030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08312030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=46.1 ms 08312030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 08312030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=84.7 ms 08312030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 08312030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 08312030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08312030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08312030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.984/46.690/84.729/19.573 ms 08312030.ms:33.984 46.690 84.729 19.573 08312030.loss:0 08312100.ping:Tue Aug 31 21:00:16 PDT 2010 08312100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08312100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 08312100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.1 ms 08312100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 08312100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 08312100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 08312100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08312100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08312100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.571/39.995/47.147/3.667 ms 08312100.ms:37.571 39.995 47.147 3.667 08312100.loss:0 08312130.ping:Tue Aug 31 21:30:16 PDT 2010 08312130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08312130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 08312130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 08312130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 08312130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.6 ms 08312130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 08312130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08312130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 08312130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.977/39.718/42.641/3.969 ms 08312130.ms:31.977 39.718 42.641 3.969 08312130.loss:0 08312200.ping:Tue Aug 31 22:00:16 PDT 2010 08312200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08312200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 08312200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 08312200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 08312200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 08312200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 08312200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08312200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08312200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.959/38.661/40.404/0.917 ms 08312200.ms:37.959 38.661 40.404 0.917 08312200.loss:0 08312230.ping:Tue Aug 31 22:30:16 PDT 2010 08312230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08312230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 08312230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=70.3 ms 08312230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=50.6 ms 08312230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 08312230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.9 ms 08312230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08312230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 08312230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.606/50.628/70.325/10.684 ms 08312230.ms:40.606 50.628 70.325 10.684 08312230.loss:0 08312300.ping:Tue Aug 31 23:00:16 PDT 2010 08312300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08312300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=196 ms 08312300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=205 ms 08312300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=184 ms 08312300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=214 ms 08312300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=214 ms 08312300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08312300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08312300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 184.994/203.336/214.940/11.369 ms 08312300.ms:184.994 203.336 214.940 11.369 08312300.loss:0 08312330.ping:Tue Aug 31 23:30:10 PDT 2010 08312330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 08312330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=93.4 ms 08312330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=81.6 ms 08312330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.4 ms 08312330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 08312330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 08312330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 08312330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 08312330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.190/61.779/93.401/21.666 ms 08312330.ms:41.190 61.779 93.401 21.666 08312330.loss:0 09010000.ping:Wed Sep 1 00:00:16 PDT 2010 09010000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=259 ms 09010000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=255 ms 09010000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=245 ms 09010000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=205 ms 09010000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=225 ms 09010000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 09010000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 205.925/238.577/259.322/20.076 ms 09010000.ms:205.925 238.577 259.322 20.076 09010000.loss:0 09010030.ping:Wed Sep 1 00:30:16 PDT 2010 09010030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=640 ms 09010030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=798 ms 09010030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=678 ms 09010030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=688 ms 09010030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=648 ms 09010030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 6562ms 09010030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 640.260/690.649/798.779/56.943 ms 09010030.ms:640.260 690.649 798.779 56.943 09010030.loss:0 09010100.ping:Wed Sep 1 01:00:14 PDT 2010 09010100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 09010100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 09010100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 09010100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 09010100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 09010100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09010100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.815/35.361/41.643/3.183 ms 09010100.ms:32.815 35.361 41.643 3.183 09010100.loss:0 09010130.ping:Wed Sep 1 01:30:17 PDT 2010 09010130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=228 ms 09010130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=209 ms 09010130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=230 ms 09010130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=190 ms 09010130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=190 ms 09010130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09010130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 190.570/209.692/230.132/17.221 ms 09010130.ms:190.570 209.692 230.132 17.221 09010130.loss:0 09010200.ping:Wed Sep 1 02:00:16 PDT 2010 09010200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 09010200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 09010200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 09010200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 09010200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.9 ms 09010200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09010200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.898/42.314/49.943/3.858 ms 09010200.ms:39.898 42.314 49.943 3.858 09010200.loss:0 09010230.ping:Wed Sep 1 02:30:17 PDT 2010 09010230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 09010230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 09010230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 09010230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 09010230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 09010230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09010230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.055/41.181/43.427/1.423 ms 09010230.ms:40.055 41.181 43.427 1.423 09010230.loss:0 09010300.ping:Wed Sep 1 03:00:16 PDT 2010 09010300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 09010300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=50.8 ms 09010300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 09010300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.9 ms 09010300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=50.6 ms 09010300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09010300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.319/45.093/50.909/7.480 ms 09010300.ms:32.319 45.093 50.909 7.480 09010300.loss:0 09010330.ping:Wed Sep 1 03:30:16 PDT 2010 09010330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=487 ms 09010330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=475 ms 09010330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=465 ms 09010330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=485 ms 09010330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=455 ms 09010330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09010330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 455.686/474.049/487.362/12.038 ms 09010330.ms:455.686 474.049 487.362 12.038 09010330.loss:0 09010400.ping:Wed Sep 1 04:00:16 PDT 2010 09010400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 09010400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=27.8 ms 09010400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 09010400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 09010400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 09010400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09010400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.858/36.410/39.740/4.323 ms 09010400.ms:27.858 36.410 39.740 4.323 09010400.loss:0 09010430.ping:Wed Sep 1 04:30:16 PDT 2010 09010430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 09010430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=24.3 ms 09010430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 09010430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=25.1 ms 09010430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.5 ms 09010430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 09010430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.338/32.796/44.567/7.467 ms 09010430.ms:24.338 32.796 44.567 7.467 09010430.loss:0 09010500.ping:Wed Sep 1 05:00:17 PDT 2010 09010500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 09010500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.4 ms 09010500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=24.7 ms 09010500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 09010500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=24.9 ms 09010500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09010500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.734/35.663/47.499/9.563 ms 09010500.ms:24.734 35.663 47.499 9.563 09010500.loss:0 09010530.ping:Wed Sep 1 05:30:16 PDT 2010 09010530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 09010530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09010530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 09010530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 09010530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 09010530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09010530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.994/39.579/41.851/3.311 ms 09010530.ms:32.994 39.579 41.851 3.311 09010530.loss:0 09010600.ping:Wed Sep 1 06:00:16 PDT 2010 09010600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 09010600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 09010600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 09010600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 09010600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 09010600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09010600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.407/37.896/39.661/0.916 ms 09010600.ms:37.407 37.896 39.661 0.916 09010600.loss:0 09010630.ping:Wed Sep 1 06:30:16 PDT 2010 09010630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 09010630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09010630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09010630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 09010630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.8 ms 09010630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09010630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.647/35.816/43.887/4.038 ms 09010630.ms:33.647 35.816 43.887 4.038 09010630.loss:0 09010700.ping:Wed Sep 1 07:00:17 PDT 2010 09010700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=491 ms 09010700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=422 ms 09010700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=300 ms 09010700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=360 ms 09010700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=540 ms 09010700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09010700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 300.985/423.384/540.692/86.391 ms 09010700.ms:300.985 423.384 540.692 86.391 09010700.loss:0 09010730.ping:Wed Sep 1 07:30:17 PDT 2010 09010730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 09010730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 09010730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 09010730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 09010730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 09010730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09010730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.398/38.796/39.044/0.306 ms 09010730.ms:38.398 38.796 39.044 0.306 09010730.loss:0 09010800.ping:Wed Sep 1 08:00:17 PDT 2010 09010800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 09010800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=49.2 ms 09010800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 09010800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 09010800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 09010800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09010800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.780/41.626/49.252/3.913 ms 09010800.ms:38.780 41.626 49.252 3.913 09010800.loss:0 09010830.ping:Wed Sep 1 08:30:17 PDT 2010 09010830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 09010830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 09010830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 09010830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 09010830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 09010830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09010830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.396/41.062/43.316/1.529 ms 09010830.ms:39.396 41.062 43.316 1.529 09010830.loss:0 09010900.ping:Wed Sep 1 09:00:16 PDT 2010 09010900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=536 ms 09010900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=589 ms 09010900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=600 ms 09010900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=551 ms 09010900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=582 ms 09010900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4594ms 09010900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 536.833/572.243/600.653/24.006 ms 09010900.ms:536.833 572.243 600.653 24.006 09010900.loss:0 09010930.ping:Wed Sep 1 09:30:16 PDT 2010 09010930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09010930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=287 ms 09010930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=305 ms 09010930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=325 ms 09010930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=327 ms 09010930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=316 ms 09010930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09010930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 09010930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 287.079/312.538/327.005/14.848 ms 09010930.ms:287.079 312.538 327.005 14.848 09010930.loss:0 09011000.ping:Wed Sep 1 10:00:16 PDT 2010 09011000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 09011000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 09011000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.0 ms 09011000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=101 ms 09011000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=30.7 ms 09011000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09011000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.768/53.481/101.368/24.799 ms 09011000.ms:30.768 53.481 101.368 24.799 09011000.loss:0 09011030.ping:Wed Sep 1 10:30:16 PDT 2010 09011030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 09011030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 09011030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 09011030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 09011030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 09011030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09011030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.423/36.962/38.557/0.838 ms 09011030.ms:36.423 36.962 38.557 0.838 09011030.loss:0 09011100.ping:Wed Sep 1 11:00:16 PDT 2010 09011100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=53.8 ms 09011100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=51.9 ms 09011100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.2 ms 09011100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=51.9 ms 09011100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=132 ms 09011100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09011100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 51.927/68.435/132.166/31.874 ms 09011100.ms:51.927 68.435 132.166 31.874 09011100.loss:0 09011130.ping:Wed Sep 1 11:30:16 PDT 2010 09011130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 09011130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 09011130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.2 ms 09011130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09011130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=171 ms 09011130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09011130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.895/70.041/171.813/51.038 ms 09011130.ms:41.895 70.041 171.813 51.038 09011130.loss:0 09011200.ping:Wed Sep 1 12:00:16 PDT 2010 09011200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 09011200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=77.4 ms 09011200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=138 ms 09011200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.2 ms 09011200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.4 ms 09011200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09011200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.492/69.799/138.319/36.828 ms 09011200.ms:36.492 69.799 138.319 36.828 09011200.loss:0 09011230.ping:Wed Sep 1 12:30:16 PDT 2010 09011230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 09011230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=73.6 ms 09011230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.9 ms 09011230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 09011230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=73.6 ms 09011230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09011230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.418/54.010/73.638/16.298 ms 09011230.ms:35.418 54.010 73.638 16.298 09011230.loss:0 09011300.ping:Wed Sep 1 13:00:16 PDT 2010 09011300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 09011300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.6 ms 09011300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 09011300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09011300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 09011300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09011300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.998/37.119/46.676/4.859 ms 09011300.ms:33.998 37.119 46.676 4.859 09011300.loss:0 09011330.ping:Wed Sep 1 13:30:16 PDT 2010 09011330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 09011330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 09011330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=74.9 ms 09011330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 09011330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.2 ms 09011330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 09011330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.899/45.839/74.913/15.000 ms 09011330.ms:34.899 45.839 74.913 15.000 09011330.loss:0 09011400.ping:Wed Sep 1 14:00:08 PDT 2010 09011400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 09011400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=55.3 ms 09011400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.2 ms 09011400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 09011400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09011400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09011400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.043/45.197/55.371/7.708 ms 09011400.ms:34.043 45.197 55.371 7.708 09011400.loss:0 09011430.ping:Wed Sep 1 14:30:16 PDT 2010 09011430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 09011430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 09011430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 09011430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 09011430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 09011430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09011430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.866/36.904/38.855/1.238 ms 09011430.ms:35.866 36.904 38.855 1.238 09011430.loss:0 09011500.ping:Wed Sep 1 15:00:16 PDT 2010 09011500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=320 ms 09011500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=431 ms 09011500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=422 ms 09011500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=332 ms 09011500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=272 ms 09011500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09011500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 272.739/355.978/431.594/61.425 ms 09011500.ms:272.739 355.978 431.594 61.425 09011500.loss:0 09011530.ping:Wed Sep 1 15:30:16 PDT 2010 09011530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.3 ms 09011530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 09011530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 09011530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 09011530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=28.1 ms 09011530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09011530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.191/38.729/50.386/7.037 ms 09011530.ms:28.191 38.729 50.386 7.037 09011530.loss:0 09011600.ping:Wed Sep 1 16:00:16 PDT 2010 09011600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=464 ms 09011600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=679 ms 09011600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=347 ms 09011600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=536 ms 09011600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=546 ms 09011600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 5457ms 09011600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 347.029/514.870/679.406/108.916 ms 09011600.ms:347.029 514.870 679.406 108.916 09011600.loss:0 09011630.ping:Wed Sep 1 16:30:16 PDT 2010 09011630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 09011630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09011630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09011630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 09011630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=50.5 ms 09011630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09011630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.167/40.894/50.503/5.813 ms 09011630.ms:32.167 40.894 50.503 5.813 09011630.loss:0 09011700.ping:Wed Sep 1 17:00:16 PDT 2010 09011700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.1 ms 09011700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=28.3 ms 09011700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=48.1 ms 09011700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 09011700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 09011700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09011700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.396/40.549/50.175/7.881 ms 09011700.ms:28.396 40.549 50.175 7.881 09011700.loss:0 09011730.ping:Wed Sep 1 17:30:16 PDT 2010 09011730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 09011730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.1 ms 09011730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 09011730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 09011730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.8 ms 09011730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09011730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.796/36.932/39.170/1.360 ms 09011730.ms:35.796 36.932 39.170 1.360 09011730.loss:0 09011800.ping:Wed Sep 1 18:00:16 PDT 2010 09011800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=80.0 ms 09011800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 09011800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 09011800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=101 ms 09011800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 09011800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09011800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.549/61.166/101.794/25.262 ms 09011800.ms:40.549 61.166 101.794 25.262 09011800.loss:0 09011830.ping:Wed Sep 1 18:30:13 PDT 2010 09011830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 09011830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 09011830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 09011830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 09011830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=120 ms 09011830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09011830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.687/56.246/120.213/31.991 ms 09011830.ms:39.687 56.246 120.213 31.991 09011830.loss:0 09011900.ping:Wed Sep 1 19:00:16 PDT 2010 09011900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 09011900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 09011900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=70.4 ms 09011900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 09011900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=29.9 ms 09011900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09011900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.995/44.600/70.412/13.596 ms 09011900.ms:29.995 44.600 70.412 13.596 09011900.loss:0 09011930.ping:Wed Sep 1 19:30:16 PDT 2010 09011930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09011930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 09011930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 09011930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 09011930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=30.5 ms 09011930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=70.0 ms 09011930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09011930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09011930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.521/45.108/70.001/13.209 ms 09011930.ms:30.521 45.108 70.001 13.209 09011930.loss:0 09012000.ping:Wed Sep 1 20:00:16 PDT 2010 09012000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09012000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.0 ms 09012000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=119 ms 09012000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=76.5 ms 09012000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=176 ms 09012000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=56.3 ms 09012000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09012000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09012000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.031/91.353/176.819/52.008 ms 09012000.ms:28.031 91.353 176.819 52.008 09012000.loss:0 09012030.ping:Wed Sep 1 20:30:16 PDT 2010 09012030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09012030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=285 ms 09012030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=396 ms 09012030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=386 ms 09012030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=367 ms 09012030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=297 ms 09012030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09012030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09012030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 285.623/346.794/396.422/46.208 ms 09012030.ms:285.623 346.794 396.422 46.208 09012030.loss:0 09012100.ping:Wed Sep 1 21:00:16 PDT 2010 09012100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09012100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=69.7 ms 09012100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 09012100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=28.4 ms 09012100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.2 ms 09012100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=28.2 ms 09012100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09012100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09012100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.285/42.626/69.769/15.444 ms 09012100.ms:28.285 42.626 69.769 15.444 09012100.loss:0 09012130.ping:Wed Sep 1 21:30:17 PDT 2010 09012130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09012130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 09012130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.4 ms 09012130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.4 ms 09012130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=25.1 ms 09012130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=25.4 ms 09012130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09012130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09012130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.166/29.263/35.471/4.804 ms 09012130.ms:25.166 29.263 35.471 4.804 09012130.loss:0 09012200.ping:Wed Sep 1 22:00:16 PDT 2010 09012200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09012200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 09012200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 09012200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 09012200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=49.5 ms 09012200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 09012200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09012200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09012200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.659/43.706/49.766/4.855 ms 09012200.ms:39.659 43.706 49.766 4.855 09012200.loss:0 09012230.ping:Wed Sep 1 22:30:16 PDT 2010 09012230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09012230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=236 ms 09012230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=249 ms 09012230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=280 ms 09012230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=240 ms 09012230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=260 ms 09012230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09012230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 6386ms 09012230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 236.450/253.439/280.576/15.864 ms 09012230.ms:236.450 253.439 280.576 15.864 09012230.loss:0 09012300.ping:Wed Sep 1 23:00:16 PDT 2010 09012300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09012300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=319 ms 09012300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=260 ms 09012300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=241 ms 09012300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=212 ms 09012300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=232 ms 09012300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09012300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09012300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 212.685/253.589/319.810/36.585 ms 09012300.ms:212.685 253.589 319.810 36.585 09012300.loss:0 09012330.ping:Wed Sep 1 23:30:17 PDT 2010 09012330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09012330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 09012330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 09012330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09012330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 09012330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.1 ms 09012330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09012330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09012330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.968/36.493/44.138/3.882 ms 09012330.ms:33.968 36.493 44.138 3.882 09012330.loss:0 09020000.ping:Thu Sep 2 00:00:16 PDT 2010 09020000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=64.3 ms 09020000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 09020000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.4 ms 09020000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=52.4 ms 09020000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 09020000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09020000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.495/45.348/64.339/11.746 ms 09020000.ms:32.495 45.348 64.339 11.746 09020000.loss:0 09020030.ping:Thu Sep 2 00:30:17 PDT 2010 09020030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=239 ms 09020030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=270 ms 09020030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=200 ms 09020030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=270 ms 09020030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=250 ms 09020030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09020030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 200.547/246.402/270.848/25.858 ms 09020030.ms:200.547 246.402 270.848 25.858 09020030.loss:0 09020100.ping:Thu Sep 2 01:00:16 PDT 2010 09020100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 09020100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 09020100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 09020100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 09020100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 09020100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09020100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.918/35.490/36.904/0.761 ms 09020100.ms:34.918 35.490 36.904 0.761 09020100.loss:0 09020130.ping:Thu Sep 2 01:30:09 PDT 2010 09020130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 09020130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=64.9 ms 09020130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 09020130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 09020130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 09020130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09020130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.602/41.170/64.973/11.934 ms 09020130.ms:33.602 41.170 64.973 11.934 09020130.loss:0 09020200.ping:Thu Sep 2 02:00:17 PDT 2010 09020200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 09020200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=62.2 ms 09020200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 09020200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09020200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=51.4 ms 09020200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09020200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.312/46.119/62.235/9.902 ms 09020200.ms:33.312 46.119 62.235 9.902 09020200.loss:0 09020230.ping:Thu Sep 2 02:30:17 PDT 2010 09020230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 09020230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=51.0 ms 09020230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=28.1 ms 09020230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 09020230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 09020230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09020230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.158/39.136/51.024/7.277 ms 09020230.ms:28.158 39.136 51.024 7.277 09020230.loss:0 09020300.ping:Thu Sep 2 03:00:08 PDT 2010 09020300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 09020300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09020300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 09020300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=25.2 ms 09020300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 09020300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09020300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.273/32.492/35.143/3.689 ms 09020300.ms:25.273 32.492 35.143 3.689 09020300.loss:0 09020330.ping:Thu Sep 2 03:30:16 PDT 2010 09020330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 09020330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=46.6 ms 09020330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 09020330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.6 ms 09020330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 09020330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09020330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.476/41.097/46.685/4.608 ms 09020330.ms:36.476 41.097 46.685 4.608 09020330.loss:0 09020400.ping:Thu Sep 2 04:00:17 PDT 2010 09020400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=26.9 ms 09020400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.1 ms 09020400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.1 ms 09020400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 09020400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 09020400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09020400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.963/39.325/45.159/7.358 ms 09020400.ms:26.963 39.325 45.159 7.358 09020400.loss:0 09020430.ping:Thu Sep 2 04:30:17 PDT 2010 09020430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 09020430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=30.8 ms 09020430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=31.1 ms 09020430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=31.5 ms 09020430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 09020430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09020430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.872/34.961/41.154/4.657 ms 09020430.ms:30.872 34.961 41.154 4.657 09020430.loss:0 09020500.ping:Thu Sep 2 05:00:16 PDT 2010 09020500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 09020500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.6 ms 09020500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 09020500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=26.5 ms 09020500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 09020500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09020500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.578/36.079/45.661/6.058 ms 09020500.ms:26.578 36.079 45.661 6.058 09020500.loss:0 09020530.ping:Thu Sep 2 05:30:16 PDT 2010 09020530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=439 ms 09020530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=430 ms 09020530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=471 ms 09020530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=432 ms 09020530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=513 ms 09020530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3996ms 09020530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 430.039/457.050/513.018/31.640 ms 09020530.ms:430.039 457.050 513.018 31.640 09020530.loss:0 09020600.ping:Thu Sep 2 06:00:16 PDT 2010 09020600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 09020600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 09020600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=28.7 ms 09020600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=28.6 ms 09020600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 09020600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09020600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.665/33.951/38.195/4.303 ms 09020600.ms:28.665 33.951 38.195 4.303 09020600.loss:0 09020630.ping:Thu Sep 2 06:30:16 PDT 2010 09020630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.9 ms 09020630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 09020630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 09020630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 09020630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 09020630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09020630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.137/37.272/45.916/4.505 ms 09020630.ms:34.137 37.272 45.916 4.505 09020630.loss:0 09020700.ping:Thu Sep 2 07:00:16 PDT 2010 09020700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 09020700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 09020700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 09020700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 09020700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 09020700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09020700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.120/34.520/35.523/0.540 ms 09020700.ms:34.120 34.520 35.523 0.540 09020700.loss:0 09020730.ping:Thu Sep 2 07:30:16 PDT 2010 09020730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=226 ms 09020730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=197 ms 09020730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=234 ms 09020730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=214 ms 09020730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=234 ms 09020730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09020730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 197.442/221.485/234.647/14.063 ms 09020730.ms:197.442 221.485 234.647 14.063 09020730.loss:0 09020800.ping:Thu Sep 2 08:00:16 PDT 2010 09020800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=227 ms 09020800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=216 ms 09020800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=276 ms 09020800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=216 ms 09020800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=256 ms 09020800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09020800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 216.306/238.654/276.180/23.781 ms 09020800.ms:216.306 238.654 276.180 23.781 09020800.loss:0 09020830.ping:Thu Sep 2 08:30:17 PDT 2010 09020830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 09020830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=28.1 ms 09020830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=28.9 ms 09020830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=29.5 ms 09020830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 09020830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09020830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.129/32.862/40.008/4.961 ms 09020830.ms:28.129 32.862 40.008 4.961 09020830.loss:0 09020900.ping:Thu Sep 2 09:00:16 PDT 2010 09020900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=29.3 ms 09020900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 09020900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=27.1 ms 09020900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=27.5 ms 09020900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=187 ms 09020900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09020900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.184/61.843/187.452/62.921 ms 09020900.ms:27.184 61.843 187.452 62.921 09020900.loss:0 09020930.ping:Thu Sep 2 09:30:16 PDT 2010 09020930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09020930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=46.8 ms 09020930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 09020930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.5 ms 09020930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=24.8 ms 09020930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 09020930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09020930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09020930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.853/35.478/46.874/6.975 ms 09020930.ms:24.853 35.478 46.874 6.975 09020930.loss:0 09021000.ping:Thu Sep 2 10:00:11 PDT 2010 09021000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 09021000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.1 ms 09021000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=56.4 ms 09021000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=24.6 ms 09021000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 09021000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09021000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.688/38.768/56.490/10.811 ms 09021000.ms:24.688 38.768 56.490 10.811 09021000.loss:0 09021030.ping:Thu Sep 2 10:30:16 PDT 2010 09021030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 09021030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.6 ms 09021030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 09021030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 09021030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 09021030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09021030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.965/38.421/45.669/3.749 ms 09021030.ms:34.965 38.421 45.669 3.749 09021030.loss:0 09021100.ping:Thu Sep 2 11:00:16 PDT 2010 09021100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=547 ms 09021100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=640 ms 09021100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=620 ms 09021100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=611 ms 09021100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=492 ms 09021100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 6245ms 09021100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 492.842/582.512/640.630/54.633 ms 09021100.ms:492.842 582.512 640.630 54.633 09021100.loss:0 09021130.ping:Thu Sep 2 11:30:16 PDT 2010 09021130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=26.6 ms 09021130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 09021130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=54.7 ms 09021130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 09021130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.1 ms 09021130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09021130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.686/39.239/54.787/9.733 ms 09021130.ms:26.686 39.239 54.787 9.733 09021130.loss:0 09021200.ping:Thu Sep 2 12:00:16 PDT 2010 09021200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=52.7 ms 09021200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 09021200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=31.6 ms 09021200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 09021200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.3 ms 09021200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09021200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.331/39.755/52.798/7.902 ms 09021200.ms:31.331 39.755 52.798 7.902 09021200.loss:0 09021230.ping:Thu Sep 2 12:30:16 PDT 2010 09021230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.1 ms 09021230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.6 ms 09021230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 09021230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=150 ms 09021230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 09021230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09021230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.103/63.137/150.373/43.629 ms 09021230.ms:40.103 63.137 150.373 43.629 09021230.loss:0 09021300.ping:Thu Sep 2 13:00:16 PDT 2010 09021300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 09021300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=91.6 ms 09021300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 09021300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 09021300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 09021300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09021300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.274/51.142/91.648/20.267 ms 09021300.ms:40.274 51.142 91.648 20.267 09021300.loss:0 09021330.ping:Thu Sep 2 13:30:16 PDT 2010 09021330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=44.9 ms 09021330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.9 ms 09021330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 09021330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 09021330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 09021330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09021330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.708/39.382/44.988/5.386 ms 09021330.ms:32.708 39.382 44.988 5.386 09021330.loss:0 09021400.ping:Thu Sep 2 14:00:16 PDT 2010 09021400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=143 ms 09021400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=161 ms 09021400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=131 ms 09021400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=151 ms 09021400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=212 ms 09021400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09021400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 131.426/159.973/212.402/28.010 ms 09021400.ms:131.426 159.973 212.402 28.010 09021400.loss:0 09021430.ping:Thu Sep 2 14:30:16 PDT 2010 09021430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 09021430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=84.3 ms 09021430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 09021430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=24.2 ms 09021430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 09021430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09021430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.247/42.912/84.378/21.195 ms 09021430.ms:24.247 42.912 84.378 21.195 09021430.loss:0 09021500.ping:Thu Sep 2 15:00:16 PDT 2010 09021500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 09021500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 09021500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 09021500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 09021500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 09021500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09021500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.441/35.788/42.367/3.320 ms 09021500.ms:33.441 35.788 42.367 3.320 09021500.loss:0 09021530.ping:Thu Sep 2 15:30:16 PDT 2010 09021530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=72.1 ms 09021530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 09021530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=50.3 ms 09021530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 09021530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 09021530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09021530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.843/48.561/72.156/12.448 ms 09021530.ms:39.843 48.561 72.156 12.448 09021530.loss:0 09021600.ping:Thu Sep 2 16:00:16 PDT 2010 09021600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 09021600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=82.3 ms 09021600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 09021600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09021600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=53.9 ms 09021600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09021600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.735/49.203/82.372/18.144 ms 09021600.ms:33.735 49.203 82.372 18.144 09021600.loss:0 09021630.ping:Thu Sep 2 16:30:16 PDT 2010 09021630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=485 ms 09021630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=196 ms 09021630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=237 ms 09021630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 09021630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=47.4 ms 09021630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09021630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.492/200.833/485.331/162.791 ms 09021630.ms:37.492 200.833 485.331 162.791 09021630.loss:0 09021700.ping:Thu Sep 2 17:00:16 PDT 2010 09021700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=653 ms 09021700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=639 ms 09021700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=759 ms 09021700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=670 ms 09021700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=739 ms 09021700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4873ms 09021700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 639.284/692.488/759.806/48.142 ms 09021700.ms:639.284 692.488 759.806 48.142 09021700.loss:0 09021730.ping:Thu Sep 2 17:30:16 PDT 2010 09021730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 09021730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09021730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.0 ms 09021730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 09021730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 09021730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09021730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.222/38.401/45.023/5.302 ms 09021730.ms:33.222 38.401 45.023 5.302 09021730.loss:0 09021800.ping:Thu Sep 2 18:00:16 PDT 2010 09021800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 09021800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=207 ms 09021800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=307 ms 09021800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 09021800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 09021800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09021800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.922/125.324/307.442/112.351 ms 09021800.ms:36.922 125.324 307.442 112.351 09021800.loss:0 09021830.ping:Thu Sep 2 18:30:16 PDT 2010 09021830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=233 ms 09021830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=231 ms 09021830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=201 ms 09021830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=211 ms 09021830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=201 ms 09021830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09021830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 201.438/216.019/233.532/14.140 ms 09021830.ms:201.438 216.019 233.532 14.140 09021830.loss:0 09021900.ping:Thu Sep 2 19:00:16 PDT 2010 09021900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 09021900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 09021900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=127 ms 09021900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 09021900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 09021900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09021900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.319/55.974/127.817/35.930 ms 09021900.ms:37.319 55.974 127.817 35.930 09021900.loss:0 09021930.ping:Thu Sep 2 19:30:16 PDT 2010 09021930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09021930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=30.1 ms 09021930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=58.6 ms 09021930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 09021930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=88.0 ms 09021930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.0 ms 09021930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09021930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09021930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.133/52.695/88.061/20.079 ms 09021930.ms:30.133 52.695 88.061 20.079 09021930.loss:0 09022000.ping:Thu Sep 2 20:00:16 PDT 2010 09022000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09022000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 09022000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=50.8 ms 09022000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=28.1 ms 09022000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.7 ms 09022000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.9 ms 09022000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09022000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09022000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 28.180/38.871/50.860/7.221 ms 09022000.ms:28.180 38.871 50.860 7.221 09022000.loss:0 09022030.ping:Thu Sep 2 20:30:16 PDT 2010 09022030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09022030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 09022030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 09022030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 09022030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 09022030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09022030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09022030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09022030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.660/34.179/34.507/0.359 ms 09022030.ms:33.660 34.179 34.507 0.359 09022030.loss:0 09022100.ping:Thu Sep 2 21:00:16 PDT 2010 09022100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09022100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=287 ms 09022100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=238 ms 09022100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=208 ms 09022100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=188 ms 09022100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=228 ms 09022100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09022100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09022100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 188.606/230.250/287.121/33.187 ms 09022100.ms:188.606 230.250 287.121 33.187 09022100.loss:0 09022130.ping:Thu Sep 2 21:30:16 PDT 2010 09022130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09022130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09022130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 09022130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 09022130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.1 ms 09022130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09022130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09022130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09022130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.110/39.997/42.255/3.953 ms 09022130.ms:32.110 39.997 42.255 3.953 09022130.loss:0 09022200.ping:Thu Sep 2 22:00:16 PDT 2010 09022200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09022200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 09022200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 09022200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.6 ms 09022200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 09022200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=26.1 ms 09022200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09022200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09022200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.633/31.205/36.158/4.425 ms 09022200.ms:25.633 31.205 36.158 4.425 09022200.loss:0 09022230.ping:Thu Sep 2 22:30:16 PDT 2010 09022230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09022230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=208 ms 09022230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=219 ms 09022230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=196 ms 09022230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=216 ms 09022230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=246 ms 09022230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09022230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09022230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 196.633/217.400/246.347/16.465 ms 09022230.ms:196.633 217.400 246.347 16.465 09022230.loss:0 09022300.ping:Thu Sep 2 23:00:16 PDT 2010 09022300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09022300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 09022300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 09022300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.8 ms 09022300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=29.9 ms 09022300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.2 ms 09022300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09022300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09022300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.942/37.727/43.878/5.488 ms 09022300.ms:29.942 37.727 43.878 5.488 09022300.loss:0 09022330.ping:Thu Sep 2 23:30:16 PDT 2010 09022330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09022330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=218 ms 09022330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=249 ms 09022330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=280 ms 09022330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=260 ms 09022330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=250 ms 09022330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09022330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09022330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 218.112/251.609/280.112/20.113 ms 09022330.ms:218.112 251.609 280.112 20.113 09022330.loss:0 09030000.ping:Fri Sep 3 00:00:16 PDT 2010 09030000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 09030000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 09030000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 09030000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 09030000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=26.3 ms 09030000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09030000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.356/35.566/39.546/4.767 ms 09030000.ms:26.356 35.566 39.546 4.767 09030000.loss:0 09030030.ping:Fri Sep 3 00:30:16 PDT 2010 09030030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=274 ms 09030030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=264 ms 09030030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=265 ms 09030030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=275 ms 09030030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=285 ms 09030030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09030030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 264.924/273.173/285.961/7.805 ms 09030030.ms:264.924 273.173 285.961 7.805 09030030.loss:0 09030100.ping:Fri Sep 3 01:00:16 PDT 2010 09030100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 09030100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.2 ms 09030100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 09030100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=48.7 ms 09030100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 09030100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 09030100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.658/41.684/48.725/3.918 ms 09030100.ms:38.658 41.684 48.725 3.918 09030100.loss:0 09030130.ping:Fri Sep 3 01:30:16 PDT 2010 09030130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.2 ms 09030130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 09030130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.0 ms 09030130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 09030130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=26.9 ms 09030130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09030130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 26.930/36.471/45.285/5.831 ms 09030130.ms:26.930 36.471 45.285 5.831 09030130.loss:0 09030200.ping:Fri Sep 3 02:00:16 PDT 2010 09030200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.6 ms 09030200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=130 ms 09030200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=337 ms 09030200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=337 ms 09030200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=117 ms 09030200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09030200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 49.629/194.791/337.935/120.013 ms 09030200.ms:49.629 194.791 337.935 120.013 09030200.loss:0 09030230.ping:Fri Sep 3 02:30:16 PDT 2010 09030230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 09030230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.2 ms 09030230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 09030230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=29.0 ms 09030230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 09030230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09030230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.080/36.618/39.324/3.833 ms 09030230.loss:0 09030230.ms:29.080 36.618 39.324 3.833 09030300.ping:Fri Sep 3 03:00:17 PDT 2010 09030300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 09030300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 09030300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 09030300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 09030300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 09030300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09030300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.390/37.929/39.034/0.998 ms 09030300.ms:36.390 37.929 39.034 0.998 09030300.loss:0 09030330.ping:Fri Sep 3 03:30:16 PDT 2010 09030330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=30.7 ms 09030330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 09030330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=92.6 ms 09030330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.7 ms 09030330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.2 ms 09030330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09030330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.744/48.239/92.667/22.740 ms 09030330.ms:30.744 48.239 92.667 22.740 09030330.loss:0 09030400.ping:Fri Sep 3 04:00:16 PDT 2010 09030400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 09030400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=124 ms 09030400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 09030400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 09030400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 09030400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09030400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.936/54.477/124.116/34.959 ms 09030400.ms:34.936 54.477 124.116 34.959 09030400.loss:0 09030430.ping:Fri Sep 3 04:30:16 PDT 2010 09030430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=44.5 ms 09030430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 09030430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=23.5 ms 09030430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 09030430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 09030430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09030430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.551/37.799/44.561/8.179 ms 09030430.ms:23.551 37.799 44.561 8.179 09030430.loss:0 09030500.ping:Fri Sep 3 05:00:17 PDT 2010 09030500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.5 ms 09030500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 09030500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 09030500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 09030500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 09030500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09030500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.678/36.096/37.548/0.765 ms 09030500.ms:35.678 36.096 37.548 0.765 09030500.loss:0 09030530.ping:Fri Sep 3 05:30:17 PDT 2010 09030530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 09030530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 09030530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.4 ms 09030530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 09030530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 09030530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09030530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.224/38.910/46.430/3.905 ms 09030530.ms:36.224 38.910 46.430 3.905 09030530.loss:0 09030600.ping:Fri Sep 3 06:00:16 PDT 2010 09030600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 09030600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 09030600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.1 ms 09030600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 09030600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=201 ms 09030600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09030600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.292/73.802/201.755/64.226 ms 09030600.ms:33.292 73.802 201.755 64.226 09030600.loss:0 09030630.ping:Fri Sep 3 06:30:17 PDT 2010 09030630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=275 ms 09030630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=164 ms 09030630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=294 ms 09030630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=404 ms 09030630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=384 ms 09030630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09030630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 164.544/304.676/404.311/85.820 ms 09030630.ms:164.544 304.676 404.311 85.820 09030630.loss:0 09030700.ping:Fri Sep 3 07:00:16 PDT 2010 09030700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 09030700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 09030700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 09030700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 09030700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 09030700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09030700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.419/39.149/40.749/0.849 ms 09030700.ms:38.419 39.149 40.749 0.849 09030700.loss:0 09030730.ping:Fri Sep 3 07:30:16 PDT 2010 09030730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 09030730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 09030730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=30.9 ms 09030730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.4 ms 09030730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=97.5 ms 09030730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09030730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.996/48.970/97.514/24.474 ms 09030730.ms:30.996 48.970 97.514 24.474 09030730.loss:0 09030800.ping:Fri Sep 3 08:00:16 PDT 2010 09030800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.8 ms 09030800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 09030800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.8 ms 09030800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 09030800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 09030800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4017ms 09030800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.877/41.843/51.818/6.028 ms 09030800.ms:34.877 41.843 51.818 6.028 09030800.loss:0 09030830.ping:Fri Sep 3 08:30:17 PDT 2010 09030830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=76.9 ms 09030830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=47.3 ms 09030830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 09030830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 09030830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 09030830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09030830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.491/45.654/76.936/16.402 ms 09030830.ms:34.491 45.654 76.936 16.402 09030830.loss:0 09030900.ping:Fri Sep 3 09:00:16 PDT 2010 09030900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=371 ms 09030900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=211 ms 09030900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=159 ms 09030900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=199 ms 09030900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=219 ms 09030900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09030900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 159.647/232.348/371.272/72.464 ms 09030900.ms:159.647 232.348 371.272 72.464 09030900.loss:0 09030930.ping:Fri Sep 3 09:30:17 PDT 2010 09030930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09030930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=135 ms 09030930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=93.3 ms 09030930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 09030930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 09030930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=63.0 ms 09030930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09030930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09030930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.578/73.776/135.412/36.963 ms 09030930.ms:33.578 73.776 135.412 36.963 09030930.loss:0 09031000.ping:Fri Sep 3 10:00:16 PDT 2010 09031000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09031000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 09031000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=72.2 ms 09031000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=681 ms 09031000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=652 ms 09031000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09031000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.989/296.332/681.573/302.989 ms 09031000.ms:33.989 296.332 681.573 302.989 09031000.loss:0 09031030.ping:Fri Sep 3 10:30:16 PDT 2010 09031030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 09031030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 09031030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 09031030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 09031030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 09031030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 09031030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.253/37.994/43.121/4.402 ms 09031030.ms:33.253 37.994 43.121 4.402 09031030.loss:0 09031100.ping:Fri Sep 3 11:00:16 PDT 2010 09031100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.7 ms 09031100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=23.7 ms 09031100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=343 ms 09031100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 09031100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.7 ms 09031100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09031100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.729/97.678/343.139/122.942 ms 09031100.ms:23.729 97.678 343.139 122.942 09031100.loss:0 09031130.ping:Fri Sep 3 11:30:16 PDT 2010 09031130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=364 ms 09031130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=463 ms 09031130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=494 ms 09031130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=545 ms 09031130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=496 ms 09031130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09031130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 364.911/473.100/545.463/60.084 ms 09031130.ms:364.911 473.100 545.463 60.084 09031130.loss:0 09031200.ping:Fri Sep 3 12:00:12 PDT 2010 09031200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=232 ms 09031200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 09031200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=44.3 ms 09031200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 09031200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=124 ms 09031200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09031200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.616/93.980/232.759/77.277 ms 09031200.ms:33.616 93.980 232.759 77.277 09031200.loss:0 09031230.ping:Fri Sep 3 12:30:16 PDT 2010 09031230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=356 ms 09031230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=337 ms 09031230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=328 ms 09031230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=308 ms 09031230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=239 ms 09031230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3996ms 09031230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 239.884/313.992/356.065/40.076 ms 09031230.ms:239.884 313.992 356.065 40.076 09031230.loss:0 09031300.ping:Fri Sep 3 13:00:16 PDT 2010 09031300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 09031300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 09031300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=43.7 ms 09031300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 09031300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.5 ms 09031300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09031300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.614/42.961/43.797/0.835 ms 09031300.ms:41.614 42.961 43.797 0.835 09031300.loss:0 09031330.ping:Fri Sep 3 13:30:16 PDT 2010 09031330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=232 ms 09031330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=241 ms 09031330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=202 ms 09031330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=252 ms 09031330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=292 ms 09031330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09031330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 202.222/244.155/292.178/29.243 ms 09031330.ms:202.222 244.155 292.178 29.243 09031330.loss:0 09031400.ping:Fri Sep 3 14:00:16 PDT 2010 09031400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09031400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=459 ms 09031400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=59.5 ms 09031400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 09031400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 09031400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09031400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.910/127.617/459.742/166.242 ms 09031400.ms:38.910 127.617 459.742 166.242 09031400.loss:0 09031430.ping:Fri Sep 3 14:30:16 PDT 2010 09031430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=22.8 ms 09031430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=52.0 ms 09031430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.2 ms 09031430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.4 ms 09031430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 09031430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09031430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.884/36.315/52.052/10.016 ms 09031430.ms:22.884 36.315 52.052 10.016 09031430.loss:0 09031500.ping:Fri Sep 3 15:00:16 PDT 2010 09031500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=274 ms 09031500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=345 ms 09031500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=266 ms 09031500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=297 ms 09031500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=306 ms 09031500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09031500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 266.924/298.235/345.505/27.728 ms 09031500.ms:266.924 298.235 345.505 27.728 09031500.loss:0 09031530.ping:Fri Sep 3 15:30:16 PDT 2010 09031530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=23.0 ms 09031530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=91.3 ms 09031530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.1 ms 09031530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 09031530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 09031530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09031530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.097/47.674/91.336/22.943 ms 09031530.ms:23.097 47.674 91.336 22.943 09031530.loss:0 09031600.ping:Fri Sep 3 16:00:16 PDT 2010 09031600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 09031600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=23.3 ms 09031600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 09031600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=83.0 ms 09031600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.3 ms 09031600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09031600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.390/43.835/83.064/20.628 ms 09031600.ms:23.390 43.835 83.064 20.628 09031600.loss:0 09031630.ping:Fri Sep 3 16:30:16 PDT 2010 09031630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.7 ms 09031630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 09031630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 09031630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 09031630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 09031630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09031630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 37.269/39.941/49.788/4.932 ms 09031630.ms:37.269 39.941 49.788 4.932 09031630.loss:0 09031700.ping:Fri Sep 3 17:00:16 PDT 2010 09031700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=73.5 ms 09031700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 09031700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.7 ms 09031700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 09031700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 09031700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09031700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.213/45.049/73.587/14.839 ms 09031700.ms:34.213 45.049 73.587 14.839 09031700.loss:0 09031730.ping:Fri Sep 3 17:30:16 PDT 2010 09031730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=101 ms 09031730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=190 ms 09031730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=210 ms 09031730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=220 ms 09031730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=240 ms 09031730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09031730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 101.708/192.563/240.198/48.174 ms 09031730.ms:101.708 192.563 240.198 48.174 09031730.loss:0 09031800.ping:Fri Sep 3 18:00:16 PDT 2010 09031800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=777 ms 09031800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=545 ms 09031800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=395 ms 09031800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=205 ms 09031800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.9 ms 09031800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09031800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.903/394.265/777.950/255.778 ms 09031800.ms:45.903 394.265 777.950 255.778 09031800.loss:0 09031830.ping:Fri Sep 3 18:30:17 PDT 2010 09031830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 09031830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 09031830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 09031830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 09031830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 09031830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09031830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.061/34.530/35.677/0.617 ms 09031830.ms:34.061 34.530 35.677 0.617 09031830.loss:0 09031900.ping:Fri Sep 3 19:00:15 PDT 2010 09031900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=47.8 ms 09031900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09031900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 09031900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.5 ms 09031900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=30.2 ms 09031900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09031900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.209/41.831/50.538/7.098 ms 09031900.ms:30.209 41.831 50.538 7.098 09031900.loss:0 09031930.ping:Fri Sep 3 19:30:17 PDT 2010 09031930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09031930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=52.3 ms 09031930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 09031930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 09031930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=24.0 ms 09031930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.3 ms 09031930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09031930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09031930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.036/35.736/52.357/9.188 ms 09031930.ms:24.036 35.736 52.357 9.188 09031930.loss:0 09032000.ping:Fri Sep 3 20:00:16 PDT 2010 09032000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09032000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=416 ms 09032000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=387 ms 09032000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=355 ms 09032000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=295 ms 09032000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=465 ms 09032000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09032000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09032000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 295.155/384.166/465.275/57.276 ms 09032000.ms:295.155 384.166 465.275 57.276 09032000.loss:0 09032030.ping:Fri Sep 3 20:30:16 PDT 2010 09032030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09032030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=618 ms 09032030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=789 ms 09032030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=798 ms 09032030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=858 ms 09032030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=778 ms 09032030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09032030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4870ms 09032030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 618.703/768.741/858.701/80.020 ms 09032030.ms:618.703 768.741 858.701 80.020 09032030.loss:0 09032100.ping:Fri Sep 3 21:00:17 PDT 2010 09032100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09032100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=152 ms 09032100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=142 ms 09032100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=172 ms 09032100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=262 ms 09032100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=182 ms 09032100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09032100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09032100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 142.994/182.810/262.682/42.377 ms 09032100.ms:142.994 182.810 262.682 42.377 09032100.loss:0 09032130.ping:Fri Sep 3 21:30:16 PDT 2010 09032130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09032130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=265 ms 09032130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=215 ms 09032130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=143 ms 09032130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=192 ms 09032130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=253 ms 09032130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09032130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09032130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 143.090/214.062/265.353/43.934 ms 09032130.ms:143.090 214.062 265.353 43.934 09032130.loss:0 09032200.ping:Fri Sep 3 22:00:17 PDT 2010 09032200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09032200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=227 ms 09032200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=235 ms 09032200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=195 ms 09032200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=215 ms 09032200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=225 ms 09032200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09032200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09032200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 195.535/219.938/235.666/13.773 ms 09032200.ms:195.535 219.938 235.666 13.773 09032200.loss:0 09032230.ping:Fri Sep 3 22:30:16 PDT 2010 09032230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09032230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 09032230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 09032230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 09032230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.7 ms 09032230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 09032230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09032230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09032230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.554/39.024/43.731/4.870 ms 09032230.ms:32.554 39.024 43.731 4.870 09032230.loss:0 09032300.ping:Fri Sep 3 23:00:16 PDT 2010 09032300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09032300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 09032300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=55.6 ms 09032300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 09032300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=52.5 ms 09032300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 09032300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09032300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09032300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.414/45.553/55.697/7.663 ms 09032300.ms:34.414 45.553 55.697 7.663 09032300.loss:0 09032330.ping:Fri Sep 3 23:30:08 PDT 2010 09032330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09032330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 09032330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 09032330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 09032330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 09032330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.9 ms 09032330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09032330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09032330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.469/39.922/40.981/0.596 ms 09032330.ms:39.469 39.922 40.981 0.596 09032330.loss:0 09040000.ping:Sat Sep 4 00:00:17 PDT 2010 09040000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=610 ms 09040000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=479 ms 09040000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=440 ms 09040000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=450 ms 09040000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=440 ms 09040000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4729ms 09040000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 440.168/484.081/610.146/64.642 ms 09040000.ms:440.168 484.081 610.146 64.642 09040000.loss:0 09040030.ping:Sat Sep 4 00:30:16 PDT 2010 09040030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=96.2 ms 09040030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 09040030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 09040030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 09040030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 09040030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09040030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.524/49.057/96.294/23.923 ms 09040030.ms:34.524 49.057 96.294 23.923 09040030.loss:0 09040100.ping:Sat Sep 4 01:00:16 PDT 2010 09040100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.6 ms 09040100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=50.4 ms 09040100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 09040100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 09040100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 09040100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09040100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.022/44.729/50.401/4.354 ms 09040100.ms:41.022 44.729 50.401 4.354 09040100.loss:0 09040130.ping:Sat Sep 4 01:30:16 PDT 2010 09040130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 09040130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 09040130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 09040130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 09040130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09040130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09040130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.644/40.192/42.061/3.284 ms 09040130.ms:33.644 40.192 42.061 3.284 09040130.loss:0 09040200.ping:Sat Sep 4 02:00:16 PDT 2010 09040200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=57.9 ms 09040200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.8 ms 09040200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=46.4 ms 09040200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=56.2 ms 09040200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=66.2 ms 09040200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09040200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.814/53.147/66.238/9.534 ms 09040200.ms:38.814 53.147 66.238 9.534 09040200.loss:0 09040230.ping:Sat Sep 4 02:30:16 PDT 2010 09040230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=23.7 ms 09040230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=51.7 ms 09040230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.7 ms 09040230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 09040230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=101 ms 09040230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09040230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.758/54.139/101.961/26.010 ms 09040230.ms:23.758 54.139 101.961 26.010 09040230.loss:0 09040300.ping:Sat Sep 4 03:00:16 PDT 2010 09040300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=50.8 ms 09040300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09040300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=52.8 ms 09040300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.9 ms 09040300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 09040300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09040300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.867/46.293/52.827/4.590 ms 09040300.ms:41.867 46.293 52.827 4.590 09040300.loss:0 09040330.ping:Sat Sep 4 03:30:16 PDT 2010 09040330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 09040330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 09040330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 09040330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.4 ms 09040330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 09040330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09040330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.344/39.069/40.966/0.977 ms 09040330.ms:38.344 39.069 40.966 0.977 09040330.loss:0 09040400.ping:Sat Sep 4 04:00:16 PDT 2010 09040400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09040400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.0 ms 09040400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 09040400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 09040400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 09040400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09040400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.620/40.185/41.801/0.838 ms 09040400.ms:39.620 40.185 41.801 0.838 09040400.loss:0 09040430.ping:Sat Sep 4 04:30:16 PDT 2010 09040430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.3 ms 09040430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 09040430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 09040430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=31.9 ms 09040430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09040430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09040430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.900/35.476/41.885/3.446 ms 09040430.ms:31.900 35.476 41.885 3.446 09040430.loss:0 09040500.ping:Sat Sep 4 05:00:17 PDT 2010 09040500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 09040500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=23.9 ms 09040500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=24.1 ms 09040500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 09040500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 09040500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09040500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.926/32.214/43.608/7.435 ms 09040500.ms:23.926 32.214 43.608 7.435 09040500.loss:0 09040530.ping:Sat Sep 4 05:30:17 PDT 2010 09040530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.9 ms 09040530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 09040530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.5 ms 09040530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=53.8 ms 09040530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=44.0 ms 09040530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09040530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.514/40.586/53.850/7.525 ms 09040530.ms:34.514 40.586 53.850 7.525 09040530.loss:0 09040600.ping:Sat Sep 4 06:00:16 PDT 2010 09040600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.7 ms 09040600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 09040600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09040600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 09040600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 09040600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09040600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.873/34.335/35.738/0.704 ms 09040600.ms:33.873 34.335 35.738 0.704 09040600.loss:0 09040630.ping:Sat Sep 4 06:30:16 PDT 2010 09040630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 09040630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 09040630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 09040630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=62.1 ms 09040630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 09040630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09040630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.690/43.055/62.153/10.240 ms 09040630.ms:33.690 43.055 62.153 10.240 09040630.loss:0 09040700.ping:Sat Sep 4 07:00:16 PDT 2010 09040700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 09040700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.0 ms 09040700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 09040700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.3 ms 09040700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.2 ms 09040700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09040700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.288/37.252/39.057/1.129 ms 09040700.ms:36.288 37.252 39.057 1.129 09040700.loss:0 09040730.ping:Sat Sep 4 07:30:16 PDT 2010 09040730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=366 ms 09040730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=359 ms 09040730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=400 ms 09040730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=341 ms 09040730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=392 ms 09040730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4134ms 09040730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 341.485/372.113/400.661/21.680 ms 09040730.ms:341.485 372.113 400.661 21.680 09040730.loss:0 09040800.ping:Sat Sep 4 08:00:17 PDT 2010 09040800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=697 ms 09040800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=589 ms 09040800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=550 ms 09040800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=611 ms 09040800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=562 ms 09040800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4945ms 09040800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 550.396/602.180/697.517/52.156 ms 09040800.ms:550.396 602.180 697.517 52.156 09040800.loss:0 09040830.ping:Sat Sep 4 08:30:16 PDT 2010 09040830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=605 ms 09040830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=749 ms 09040830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=789 ms 09040830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=819 ms 09040830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=649 ms 09040830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4385ms 09040830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 605.911/723.016/819.875/81.997 ms 09040830.ms:605.911 723.016 819.875 81.997 09040830.loss:0 09040900.ping:Sat Sep 4 09:00:16 PDT 2010 09040900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=285 ms 09040900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=274 ms 09040900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=224 ms 09040900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=244 ms 09040900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=264 ms 09040900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09040900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 224.232/258.644/285.526/21.911 ms 09040900.ms:224.232 258.644 285.526 21.911 09040900.loss:0 09040930.ping:Sat Sep 4 09:30:16 PDT 2010 09040930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09040930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=328 ms 09040930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=267 ms 09040930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=327 ms 09040930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=248 ms 09040930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=389 ms 09040930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09040930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09040930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 248.957/312.540/389.932/50.171 ms 09040930.ms:248.957 312.540 389.932 50.171 09040930.loss:0 09041000.ping:Sat Sep 4 10:00:16 PDT 2010 09041000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.3 ms 09041000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 09041000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 09041000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 09041000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 09041000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09041000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.630/35.998/41.406/3.989 ms 09041000.ms:32.630 35.998 41.406 3.989 09041000.loss:0 09041030.ping:Sat Sep 4 10:30:16 PDT 2010 09041030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=395 ms 09041030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=266 ms 09041030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=247 ms 09041030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=287 ms 09041030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=257 ms 09041030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09041030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 247.485/290.977/395.724/54.021 ms 09041030.ms:247.485 290.977 395.724 54.021 09041030.loss:0 09041100.ping:Sat Sep 4 11:00:16 PDT 2010 09041100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 09041100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 09041100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 09041100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.5 ms 09041100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=43.1 ms 09041100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09041100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.538/35.869/43.188/3.727 ms 09041100.ms:33.538 35.869 43.188 3.727 09041100.loss:0 09041130.ping:Sat Sep 4 11:30:16 PDT 2010 09041130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=297 ms 09041130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=368 ms 09041130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=319 ms 09041130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=270 ms 09041130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=329 ms 09041130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09041130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 270.034/317.191/368.645/32.924 ms 09041130.ms:270.034 317.191 368.645 32.924 09041130.loss:0 09041200.ping:Sat Sep 4 12:00:16 PDT 2010 09041200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 09041200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=100 ms 09041200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 09041200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=31.8 ms 09041200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 09041200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09041200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 31.853/52.833/100.475/24.447 ms 09041200.ms:31.853 52.833 100.475 24.447 09041200.loss:0 09041230.ping:Sat Sep 4 12:30:16 PDT 2010 09041230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=37.3 ms 09041230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=35.3 ms 09041230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=25.5 ms 09041230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 09041230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 09041230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09041230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 25.570/33.738/37.370/4.173 ms 09041230.ms:25.570 33.738 37.370 4.173 09041230.loss:0 09041300.ping:Sat Sep 4 13:00:16 PDT 2010 09041300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 09041300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 09041300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 09041300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 09041300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=59.3 ms 09041300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09041300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.219/43.919/59.357/7.775 ms 09041300.ms:39.219 43.919 59.357 7.775 09041300.loss:0 09041330.ping:Sat Sep 4 13:30:16 PDT 2010 09041330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=215 ms 09041330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=263 ms 09041330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=393 ms 09041330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=213 ms 09041330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=233 ms 09041330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09041330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 213.488/263.913/393.629/67.331 ms 09041330.ms:213.488 263.913 393.629 67.331 09041330.loss:0 09041400.ping:Sat Sep 4 14:00:16 PDT 2010 09041400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 09041400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=45.2 ms 09041400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.9 ms 09041400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 09041400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=45.0 ms 09041400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09041400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.806/39.325/45.245/4.801 ms 09041400.ms:34.806 39.325 45.245 4.801 09041400.loss:0 09041430.ping:Sat Sep 4 14:30:16 PDT 2010 09041430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=177 ms 09041430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=185 ms 09041430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=215 ms 09041430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=265 ms 09041430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=205 ms 09041430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09041430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 177.488/209.884/265.421/30.914 ms 09041430.ms:177.488 209.884 265.421 30.914 09041430.loss:0 09041500.ping:Sat Sep 4 15:00:16 PDT 2010 09041500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=183 ms 09041500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=194 ms 09041500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=235 ms 09041500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=285 ms 09041500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=255 ms 09041500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09041500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 183.217/230.671/285.346/37.958 ms 09041500.ms:183.217 230.671 285.346 37.958 09041500.loss:0 09041530.ping:Sat Sep 4 15:30:16 PDT 2010 09041530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 09041530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=50.7 ms 09041530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09041530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09041530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 09041530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09041530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.646/41.055/50.721/5.741 ms 09041530.ms:32.646 41.055 50.721 5.741 09041530.loss:0 09041600.ping:Sat Sep 4 16:00:16 PDT 2010 09041600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=435 ms 09041600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=419 ms 09041600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=450 ms 09041600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=528 ms 09041600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=448 ms 09041600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4296ms 09041600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 419.491/456.637/528.992/37.843 ms 09041600.ms:419.491 456.637 528.992 37.843 09041600.loss:0 09041630.ping:Sat Sep 4 16:30:16 PDT 2010 09041630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 09041630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 09041630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 09041630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=74.5 ms 09041630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.1 ms 09041630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09041630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.106/42.681/74.526/15.939 ms 09041630.ms:34.106 42.681 74.526 15.939 09041630.loss:0 09041700.ping:Sat Sep 4 17:00:16 PDT 2010 09041700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.0 ms 09041700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.5 ms 09041700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=50.2 ms 09041700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=50.3 ms 09041700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=30.5 ms 09041700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09041700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.572/40.768/50.372/8.502 ms 09041700.ms:30.572 40.768 50.372 8.502 09041700.loss:0 09041730.ping:Sat Sep 4 17:30:17 PDT 2010 09041730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 09041730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=32.8 ms 09041730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.8 ms 09041730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=113 ms 09041730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 09041730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09041730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.841/51.199/113.942/31.535 ms 09041730.ms:32.841 51.199 113.942 31.535 09041730.loss:0 09041800.ping:Sat Sep 4 18:00:16 PDT 2010 09041800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=300 ms 09041800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=331 ms 09041800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=248 ms 09041800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=328 ms 09041800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=238 ms 09041800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09041800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 238.163/289.337/331.488/39.260 ms 09041800.ms:238.163 289.337 331.488 39.260 09041800.loss:0 09041830.ping:Sat Sep 4 18:30:16 PDT 2010 09041830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=635 ms 09041830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=569 ms 09041830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=617 ms 09041830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=608 ms 09041830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=648 ms 09041830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4758ms 09041830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 569.420/615.876/648.022/27.065 ms 09041830.ms:569.420 615.876 648.022 27.065 09041830.loss:0 09041900.ping:Sat Sep 4 19:00:17 PDT 2010 09041900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=83.5 ms 09041900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 09041900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=55.4 ms 09041900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 09041900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 09041900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09041900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.668/51.007/83.589/17.846 ms 09041900.ms:35.668 51.007 83.589 17.846 09041900.loss:0 09041930.ping:Sat Sep 4 19:30:12 PDT 2010 09041930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09041930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.4 ms 09041930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=29.7 ms 09041930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 09041930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.4 ms 09041930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.5 ms 09041930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09041930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09041930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.708/37.945/41.474/4.187 ms 09041930.ms:29.708 37.945 41.474 4.187 09041930.loss:0 09042000.ping:Sat Sep 4 20:00:17 PDT 2010 09042000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09042000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 09042000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=39.6 ms 09042000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=49.3 ms 09042000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms 09042000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=49.1 ms 09042000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09042000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09042000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.292/43.739/49.313/4.555 ms 09042000.ms:39.292 43.739 49.313 4.555 09042000.loss:0 09042030.ping:Sat Sep 4 20:30:16 PDT 2010 09042030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09042030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 09042030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.2 ms 09042030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.1 ms 09042030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 09042030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.2 ms 09042030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09042030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09042030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.101/37.119/43.216/4.727 ms 09042030.ms:33.101 37.119 43.216 4.727 09042030.loss:0 09042100.ping:Sat Sep 4 21:00:13 PDT 2010 09042100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09042100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09042100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=53.1 ms 09042100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 09042100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.2 ms 09042100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09042100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09042100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09042100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.718/39.390/53.160/7.529 ms 09042100.ms:33.718 39.390 53.160 7.529 09042100.loss:0 09042130.ping:Sat Sep 4 21:30:16 PDT 2010 09042130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09042130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 09042130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 09042130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 09042130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09042130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.4 ms 09042130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09042130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09042130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.547/37.522/40.685/3.692 ms 09042130.ms:32.547 37.522 40.685 3.692 09042130.loss:0 09042200.ping:Sat Sep 4 22:00:17 PDT 2010 09042200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09042200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=277 ms 09042200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=205 ms 09042200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=215 ms 09042200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=215 ms 09042200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=245 ms 09042200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09042200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09042200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 205.454/231.880/277.247/26.337 ms 09042200.ms:205.454 231.880 277.247 26.337 09042200.loss:0 09042230.ping:Sat Sep 4 22:30:16 PDT 2010 09042230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09042230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=110 ms 09042230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 09042230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 09042230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 09042230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 09042230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09042230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09042230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.994/55.221/110.206/27.494 ms 09042230.ms:40.994 55.221 110.206 27.494 09042230.loss:0 09042300.ping:Sat Sep 4 23:00:17 PDT 2010 09042300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09042300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms 09042300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.8 ms 09042300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.0 ms 09042300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=30.9 ms 09042300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09042300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09042300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09042300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 30.988/39.863/43.890/4.596 ms 09042300.ms:30.988 39.863 43.890 4.596 09042300.loss:0 09042330.ping:Sat Sep 4 23:30:16 PDT 2010 09042330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09042330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=35.6 ms 09042330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.5 ms 09042330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=37.1 ms 09042330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.2 ms 09042330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.6 ms 09042330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09042330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09042330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.637/36.845/37.601/0.728 ms 09042330.ms:35.637 36.845 37.601 0.728 09042330.loss:0 09050000.ping:Sun Sep 5 00:00:12 PDT 2010 09050000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 09050000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 09050000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.7 ms 09050000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=82.0 ms 09050000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.0 ms 09050000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09050000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 41.396/49.928/82.077/16.079 ms 09050000.ms:41.396 49.928 82.077 16.079 09050000.loss:0 09050030.ping:Sun Sep 5 00:30:17 PDT 2010 09050030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=536 ms 09050030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=529 ms 09050030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=538 ms 09050030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=587 ms 09050030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=558 ms 09050030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 5698ms 09050030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 529.339/549.951/587.979/21.295 ms 09050030.ms:529.339 549.951 587.979 21.295 09050030.loss:0 09050100.ping:Sun Sep 5 01:00:16 PDT 2010 09050100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.0 ms 09050100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 09050100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 09050100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09050100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 09050100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09050100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.051/40.441/42.291/3.208 ms 09050100.ms:34.051 40.441 42.291 3.208 09050100.loss:0 09050130.ping:Sun Sep 5 01:30:16 PDT 2010 09050130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms 09050130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=48.7 ms 09050130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.6 ms 09050130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 09050130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 09050130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 09050130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.132/40.708/48.710/4.038 ms 09050130.ms:38.132 40.708 48.710 4.038 09050130.loss:0 09050200.ping:Sun Sep 5 02:00:16 PDT 2010 09050200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 09050200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms 09050200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=32.3 ms 09050200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=32.6 ms 09050200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=42.8 ms 09050200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09050200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.343/37.988/42.852/4.554 ms 09050200.ms:32.343 37.988 42.852 4.554 09050200.loss:0 09050230.ping:Sun Sep 5 02:30:17 PDT 2010 09050230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=43.0 ms 09050230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=124 ms 09050230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=45.0 ms 09050230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=45.2 ms 09050230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.2 ms 09050230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09050230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.290/58.602/124.333/33.066 ms 09050230.ms:35.290 58.602 124.333 33.066 09050230.loss:0 09050300.ping:Sun Sep 5 03:00:16 PDT 2010 09050300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=39.8 ms 09050300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=27.7 ms 09050300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=23.7 ms 09050300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.6 ms 09050300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=33.4 ms 09050300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4006ms 09050300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.777/33.701/43.660/7.374 ms 09050300.ms:23.777 33.701 43.660 7.374 09050300.loss:0 09050330.ping:Sun Sep 5 03:30:17 PDT 2010 09050330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.6 ms 09050330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=55.0 ms 09050330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.9 ms 09050330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms 09050330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.8 ms 09050330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09050330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.661/42.972/55.074/6.869 ms 09050330.ms:33.661 42.972 55.074 6.869 09050330.loss:0 09050400.ping:Sun Sep 5 04:00:09 PDT 2010 09050400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09050400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 09050400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 09050400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.5 ms 09050400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=38.9 ms 09050400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09050400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.587/39.150/40.628/0.759 ms 09050400.ms:38.587 39.150 40.628 0.759 09050400.loss:0 09050430.ping:Sun Sep 5 04:30:16 PDT 2010 09050430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 09050430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.8 ms 09050430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.7 ms 09050430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=36.9 ms 09050430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.6 ms 09050430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09050430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.600/37.483/38.719/0.887 ms 09050430.ms:36.600 37.483 38.719 0.887 09050430.loss:0 09050500.ping:Sun Sep 5 05:00:08 PDT 2010 09050500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.0 ms 09050500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=41.6 ms 09050500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 09050500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.5 ms 09050500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms 09050500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09050500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.067/39.804/41.638/3.378 ms 09050500.ms:33.067 39.804 41.638 3.378 09050500.loss:0 09050530.ping:Sun Sep 5 05:30:16 PDT 2010 09050530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.5 ms 09050530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=43.7 ms 09050530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 09050530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=34.8 ms 09050530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=34.6 ms 09050530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09050530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.672/38.121/43.780/4.125 ms 09050530.ms:34.672 38.121 43.780 4.125 09050530.loss:0 09050600.ping:Sun Sep 5 06:00:16 PDT 2010 09050600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 09050600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 09050600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=80.8 ms 09050600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.8 ms 09050600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 09050600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09050600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.517/47.149/80.814/17.136 ms 09050600.ms:32.517 47.149 80.814 17.136 09050600.loss:0 09050630.ping:Sun Sep 5 06:30:16 PDT 2010 09050630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms 09050630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=38.3 ms 09050630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=108 ms 09050630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.1 ms 09050630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.0 ms 09050630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09050630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.193/54.597/108.254/27.071 ms 09050630.ms:38.193 54.597 108.254 27.071 09050630.loss:0 09050700.ping:Sun Sep 5 07:00:16 PDT 2010 09050700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=512 ms 09050700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=433 ms 09050700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=414 ms 09050700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=434 ms 09050700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=494 ms 09050700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09050700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 414.218/457.535/512.197/38.318 ms 09050700.ms:414.218 457.535 512.197 38.318 09050700.loss:0 09050730.ping:Sun Sep 5 07:30:16 PDT 2010 09050730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=76.5 ms 09050730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=44.8 ms 09050730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 09050730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=35.0 ms 09050730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=35.1 ms 09050730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09050730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.017/45.337/76.566/16.069 ms 09050730.ms:35.017 45.337 76.566 16.069 09050730.loss:0 09050800.ping:Sun Sep 5 08:00:16 PDT 2010 09050800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 09050800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.7 ms 09050800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 09050800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=38.0 ms 09050800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 09050800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09050800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.160/37.362/38.092/0.809 ms 09050800.ms:36.160 37.362 38.092 0.809 09050800.loss:0 09050830.ping:Sun Sep 5 08:30:16 PDT 2010 09050830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=45.0 ms 09050830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.4 ms 09050830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=97.1 ms 09050830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=37.8 ms 09050830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=48.2 ms 09050830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09050830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.408/52.932/97.174/22.555 ms 09050830.ms:36.408 52.932 97.174 22.555 09050830.loss:0 09050900.ping:Sun Sep 5 09:00:16 PDT 2010 09050900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=27.4 ms 09050900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=126 ms 09050900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=186 ms 09050900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=46.2 ms 09050900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=36.0 ms 09050900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09050900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.439/84.512/186.470/62.005 ms 09050900.ms:27.439 84.512 186.470 62.005 09050900.loss:0 09050930.ping:Sun Sep 5 09:30:16 PDT 2010 09050930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09050930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=34.4 ms 09050930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=36.1 ms 09050930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=186 ms 09050930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=96.8 ms 09050930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=46.3 ms 09050930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09050930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09050930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.487/80.075/186.539/57.904 ms 09050930.ms:34.487 80.075 186.539 57.904 09050930.loss:0 09051000.ping:Sun Sep 5 10:00:16 PDT 2010 09051000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09051000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=258 ms 09051000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=240 ms 09051000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=251 ms 09051000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=281 ms 09051000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=240 ms 09051000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09051000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09051000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 240.047/254.410/281.027/15.034 ms 09051000.ms:240.047 254.410 281.027 15.034 09051000.loss:0 09051030.ping:Sun Sep 5 10:30:16 PDT 2010 09051030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09051030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.3 ms 09051030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09051030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 09051030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09051030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09051030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09051030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09051030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 40.601/41.039/42.388/0.697 ms 09051030.ms:40.601 41.039 42.388 0.697 09051030.loss:0 09051100.ping:Sun Sep 5 11:00:16 PDT 2010 09051100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09051100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=32.5 ms 09051100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=91.3 ms 09051100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=40.9 ms 09051100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=40.6 ms 09051100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=40.7 ms 09051100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09051100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4002ms 09051100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.530/49.260/91.342/21.285 ms 09051100.ms:32.530 49.260 91.342 21.285 09051100.loss:0 09051130.ping:Sun Sep 5 11:30:16 PDT 2010 09051130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09051130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=361 ms 09051130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=432 ms 09051130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=353 ms 09051130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=343 ms 09051130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=323 ms 09051130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09051130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09051130.